18 / 19
Г.И. Ловецкий
18
Гуманитарный вестник
# 2
⋅
2016
Virtue and Prosperity:
Hercules problem and the modern youthy
© G.I. Lovetskiy
Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Kaluga branch, Kaluga, 248000, Russia
The article considers the problem of moral action and moral choice. The conclusion is
that moral action is the result of the microshift in interaction of the inward man forces
(mind , will and faith) when thinking and decision making in favor of one or another sys-
tem of symbolic representation of reality, where the forces of good and evil confront each
other. The ethics of responsibility signifies a stage of state active participation in the
prosperity and peaceful coexistence of people and nations. Thereby the problem of moral
responsibility of the person is not eliminated of people and nations. And the problem of
moral responsibility of the person is thereby solved.
Keywords:
welfare, justice, practical benefits, ethics of responsibility, the vital choice of
young people, moral acti
on
.
REFERENCES
[1]
Plato.
Dialogi
[Dialogs]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1986, 607 p.
[2]
Aristotle.
Sochineniya v 4 tomakh. Tom 4
[Oeuvre in 4 volums. Vol. 4]. Moscow,
Mysl Publ., 1983, 830 p.
[3]
Filisofiya nauki. Vyp. 1. Problemy ratsionalnosti
[Philosophy of Science. Issue 1
Rationality Problems]. Moscow, Institute of Philosophy RAS Publ., 1995, 325 p.
[4]
Spinoza B.
Etika
[Ethics]. St. Petersburg, Asta-Press Ltd Publ., 1993, 248 p.
[5]
Delez Zh.
Spinoza i problema vyrazheniya
[Spinoza and the Problem of Expres-
sion]. Moscow, Institute of Humanities Research Publ., 2014, 320 p.
[6]
Mill J.S.
Utilitarianism.
Crisp R., ed. Oxford University Press Publ., 1998. ISBN
0-19-875163-X. [In Russ.: Mill J.S. Utilitarizm. Rostov on Don, Don Publ.,
2013, 240 p.].
[7]
Yulina N.S. Dzhon Dyui [John Dewey]. In:
Filisofy dvadtsatogo veka. Kn. 1
[The Philosophers of the Twentieth Century. Book 1]. Moscow, “Iskusstvo XXI
vek” Publ., 2004, 367 p.
[8]
Rawls J.
A Theory of Justice.
Cambridge, Massachusetts, Belknap Press of Har-
vard University Press Publ., 1971 [In Russ.: Rolz J. Teoriya spravedlivosti. No-
vosibirsk, Novosibirsk State University Publ., 1995, 532 p.].
[9]
Dahrendorf R.
Pfade aus Utopia. Zur Theorie und Methodologie der Soziologie.
Munchen, 1967 [In Russ.: Darendorf R. Tropy iz utopii. Moscow, Praksis Publ.,
2002, 656 p.].
[10]
Nozik R.
Anarchy, State, and Utopia.
Oxford, 1993 [In Russ.: Nozik, R. Anark-
hiya, gosudarstvo i utopiya. Moscow, IRISEN Publ., 2008, 424 p.].
[11]
Semenova R.U.
Vestnik Tumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Herald of
Tumen State University
, 2006, no. 2, pp. 51–55.
[12]
Jonas H.
Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zi-
vilisation.
Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 1979, ISBN 3-518-37585-7 [In Russ.:
Jonas G. Printsip otvetstvennosti: Opyt etiki dlya tekhnologicheskoy tsivilizatsii.
Nauka kak personalnyy opyt. Moscow, Ayris-press Publ., 2004, 479 p.].
[13]
Habermas, J.
The Future of Human Nature.
Cambrige, Polity Press, 2003 [In Russ.:
Khabermas J. Budushchee chelovecheskoy prirody
.
Moscow, Ves mir Publ., 2002,
144 p.].