13 / 13
Природа истины в науке
Гуманитарный вестник
# 12·2017 13
The nature of truth in science
© S.A. Lebedev
Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, 105005, Russia
The article analyzes two paradigms in understanding the nature of scientific truth: tran-
scendentally-monistic and socio-pluralistic. The first paradigm prevailed in the classical
philosophy of science, the second one — in the nonclassical and postnonclassical episte-
mology. We define these paradigms and consider their potentialities, borderlines and
correspondence to the real science.
Keywords:
scientific truth, scientific method, empirism, apriorism, constructivism, sub-
ject of scientific knowledge
REFERENCES
[1]
Pruzhinin B.I.
Voprosy filosofii — Russian Studies in Philosophy
, 2014, no. 12,
pp. 4–13.
[2]
Lebedev S.A.
Novoe v psikhologo-pedagogicheskikh issledovaniyakh —
Modernity in psychological and educational research
, 2015, no. 2, pp. 7–26.
[3]
Stepin V.S.
Voprosy filosofii — Russian Studies in Philosophy
, 2012, no. 5,
pp. 18–25.
[4]
Lebedev S.A., Koskov S.N.
Voprosy filosofii — Russian Studies in Philosophy
,
2013, no. 5, pp. 57–69.
Lebedev S.A.
,
Dr. Sc. (Philos.), Professor of the Department of Philosophy, Bauman
Moscow State Technical University. e-mail:
saleb@rambler.ru