Previous Page  12 / 13 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12 / 13 Next Page
Page Background

Г.И. Ловецкий, И.И. Комиссаров

12

Гуманитарный вестник

# 5·2017

Hermeneutic dimension of Gadamer

in the Kuhn’s paradigmatic model of science

© G.I. Lovetskiy, I.I. Komissarov

Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Kaluga Branch,

Kaluga, 248000, Russia

The paper describes Thomas Kuhn’s normal science activities in the context of the her-

meneutical problems elaborated primarily in H.-G. Gadamer’s publications. We show

that the normal science interprets both the reality and other scientific worldviews in

compliance with Gadamer’s ideas of understanding. If one spreads Gadamer's ideas

over the philosophy of science, it can be possible to find the ways out of the crisis that

concern the epistemological problem of the truth.

Keywords:

Kuhn, normal science, paradigm, Gadamer, understanding, prejudice, prob-

lem of truth

REFERENCES

[1]

Kuhn T.S.

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

. Chicago, University of

Chicago Press, 1962 [In Russ.: Kuhn T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy.

Moscow, AST Publ., 2003, 605 p.].

[2]

Gadamer H.-G.

Wahrheit und Methode

. Tübingen, 1960. [In Russ.: Gadamer H.-

G. Istina i metod. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1988, 704 p.].

[3]

Ginev D.

CRITICA, Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofia

, 2003, vol. 35,

no. 105, pp. 65–89.

[4]

Gadamer H.-G.

Reason in the age of science

. Massachusetts, The MIT Press

Publ., 1983, 171 p.

[5]

Kuhn T.S.

The essential tension. Selected studies in scientific tradition and

change

. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press Publ., 1977, 366 p.

[6]

Kuhn T.

Posle

Struktury nauchnykh revolyutsiy

” [After “The structure of

scientific revolutions”]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2014, 443 p. [in Russ.].

[7]

Crease R.P.

Man and World

, 1997, no. 30, pp. 259–270.

[8]

Lovetskiy G.I., Gavrikova N.A.

Gumanitarnyy vestnik

Humanities Bulletin

,

2014, iss. 4. DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2014-4-197 (accessed February 14,

2017).

[9]

Borisov E.V.

Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta

Tomsk State

University Bulletin

, 2008, no. 307, pp. 28–31.

[10]

Heelan P.A.

Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science

, 1998, no. 29,

pp. 273–298.

[11]

Heelan P.A.

Man and World

, 1997, no. 30, pp. 271–298.

[12]

Lakatos I. Falsifikatsiya i metodologiya nauchno-issledovatelskikh programm

[Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes].

V kn.:

Izbrannye proizvedeniya po filosofii i metodologii nauki

[In: Selected works on

philosophy and methodology of science]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy Proekt,

Triksta Publ., 2008, pp. 281–475 [in Russ.].

[13]

Hoyningen-Huene P.

Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte

, 2001, No. 24, S. 1–12.

[14]

Kuznetsova N.I.

Nauka v ee istorii (metodologicheskie problemy)

[Science in its

history (methodological problems)]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1982, 128 p.