Previous Page  8 / 9 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 9 Next Page
Page Background

O.I. Nevdobenko

8

"Humanities Bulletin" of BMSTU # 12·2017

Approaches to the semantic definition

of logical implication relation

©

O.I. Nevdobenko

Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, 105005, Russia

The article considers two types of definition of the fundamental concept of logic, i.e. the

logical implication relation. The first type is associated with the tradition of defining

logical implication through the requirements for the inheritance of values. The variability

of this approach involves different possibilities of setting a variety of assessments. The

second type of definition is related to the computational consecution model.

Keywords:

logical implication relation, non-standard semantics, typology of logics

REFERENCES

[1]

Vasilyev N.N.

Logika i metalogika

[Logic and meta-logic]. Moscow, Logos

Publ.,

1912, pp.

50–63.

[2]

Belnap N.D. How a computer should think. In: Ryle G., ed.

Contemporary As-

pects of Philosophy

. Stocksfield, Oriel Press Ltd. Publ., 1977, pp. 30–55 [In

Russ.: Belnap N. Kak nuzhno rassuzhdat kompyuteru. In: Belnap N., Steel T.

Logika voprosov i otvetov. Moscow, Progress Publ, 1981, 290 p.].

[3]

Segerberg K.

Theoria,

1967, vol. 33, pp. 53–71.

[4]

Dunn J.M. A Comparative study of various model-theoretic treatments of nega-

tion: a history of formal negation. In: Gabbay D. M., Wansing H., eds.,

What is

Negation?

Applied Logic Series, 13, Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht,

1997,

600 p.

[5]

Voishvillo E.K.

Simvolicheskaya logika (klassicheskaya i relevantnaya). Filosofsko-

metodologicheskie aspekty

[Symbolic logic. Classical and relevant. Philosophical

and methodological aspects]. Moscow, Librokom Publ., 2011, 152 p.

[6]

Smirnova E.D.

Logicheskaya semantica i filosofskie osnovaniya logiki

[Logical

semantics and philosophical bases of logic]. Moscow, MGU Publ., 1986, 160 p.

[7]

Hosli B., Jager G.

Journal of Symbolic Logic

,

1994,

vol. 59

, no. 2. pp. 473–485.

[8]

Shalak V.I.

Logicheskiye issledovaniya — Logical Investigations,

2006, iss. 13,

pp. 273–285.

[9]

Shalak V.I.

Logicheskiye issledovaniya — Logical Investigations,

2006, iss. 13,

pp. 286–302.

[10]

Shramko Y., Wansing H.

Journal of Philosophical Logic

, 2005, vol. 34.

pp. 121–153.

[11]

Shramko Y. Die logische Wahrheitswerteontologie. In:

Was folgt. Themen zu

Wessel ente

. Christiansen B., Scheffler U., eds. Berlin, Logos-Verlag, 2004.

S. 149–169.

[12]

Shramko Y., Dunn J.M., Takenaka T.

Journal of Logic and Computation

, 2001,

vol. 11, pp. 761–788.

[13]

Wansing H.

Journal of Logic and Computation

, 2001, vol. 11, pp. 759–760.

[14]

Shramko Y., Wansing H.

Studia Logica

, 2009, vol. 91, no. 3, 160 p.

[15]

Shramko Y., Wansing H.

Studia Logica

, 2009, vol. 92, no. 2, 137 p.

[16]

Nevdobenko O.I.

Otnoshenie sledovaniya i nestandartnye semantiki

. Diss. cand.

filos. nauk. Avtoreferat [The consecution relation and non-standard semantics.

Cand. phylos. sc. diss. Author's abstract]. Moscow, MGU Publ., 2000, 20 p.