Previous Page  15 / 16 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 15 / 16 Next Page
Page Background

Наука и философия о возможности использования объективно-нереальных ситуаций

Гуманитарный вестник

# 3·2017 15

Science and Philosophy on the possibility of using

objectively unrealistic situations

© N.N Gubanov

1

, N.I. Gubanov

2

, O.N. Maltseva

2

1

Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, 105005, Russia

2

Tyumen State Medical University

,

Tyumen, 625023, Russia

According to the information approach to the “mind and brain” problem and figurative

and indicative concept of sensory reflection, we show the possibility of creating objec-

tively unrealistic, but subjectively realistic situations. A person cannot distinguish be-

tween these situations by his own perception. We focus on the gnosiological status of the

artifactual experiences and prospects of their use.

Keywords:

sensory reflection, objectively unrealistic situations, artifactual perception,

neurodynamic code, information invariance

REFERENCES



Dubrovskiy D.I.

Psihicheskie yavleniya i mozg

[Psychic phenomena and the

brain]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1971, 386 p.



Dubrovskiy D.I.

Problema idealnogo. Subektivnaya realnost

[The problem of

the ideal. Subjective reality]. Moscow, Kanon+ Publ., 2002, 368 p.



Gubanov N.I

. Chuvstvennoe otrazhenie

[Sensory reflection]. Moscow, Mysl

Publ., 1986, 239 p.



Agadzhanyan N.A., Smirnov V.M. Sensornye sistemy

[Sensory systems].

Normalnaya fiziologiya

[Normal physiology]

.

Ch.

16. Moscow, Meditsinskoe

informatsionnoe agentstvo Publ., 2009, pp. 391–424.



Gubanov N.I., Gubanov N.N.

Filosofiya i obshchestvo — Social Studies

,

2015,

no. 1 (76), pp. 48–64.



Gubanov N.N., Gubanov N.I.

Gumanitarnyy vestnik — Humanities Bulletin

, 2016,

no. 11 (49). Available at:

http://dx.doi.org/10.18698/2306-8477-2016-11-400



Subbotin A.L. Pervichnye i vtorichnye kachestva [Primary and secondary

qualities]. In:

Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya

[New Encyclopedia of Phi-

losophy].Vol. 3. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 2010, p. 218.



Kasavin I.T.

Eрistemologiya i Filosofiya nauki — Epistemology & Philosophy

of Science

, 2006, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 5–12.



Gubanov N.N., Gubanov N.I.

Gumanitarnyy vestnik — Humanities Bulletin

, 2016,

no. 2 (40). Available at:

http://dx.doi.org/10.18698/2306-8477-2016-02-344



Gubanov N.I.

Filosofskie nauki — Philosophical Sciences

, 1984, no. 3, pp. 73–81.



Gubanov N.I., Gubanov N.N.

Vestnik Ishimskogo gosudarstvennogo

pedago-

gicheskogo institut im. P.P. Ershova — Bulletin of Yershov Ishim State Peda-

gogical Institute

, 2014, no. 3 (15), pp. 90–96.



Gubanov N.I., Gubanov N.N.

Filosofiya i obshchestvo — Social Studies,

2010,

no. 2 (58), pp. 90–104.



Lem S.

Summa tekhnologii

[Technology sum]. Moscow, Mir Publ., 2012, 687 p.



Russel B.

Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits.

London and New York,

Routledge classics Publ., 2009. [In Russ.: Rassel B. Chelovecheskoe poznanie,

ego sfera i granitsy

[Human knowledge, its scopeand limits]. Moscow, Izd.

Inostr. Lit. Publ., 1957, 542 p.].