Previous Page  18 / 19 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 18 / 19 Next Page
Page Background

N.N. Gubanov, N.I. Gubanov, A.E. Volkov

18

"Humanities Bulletin" of BMSTU # 12·2017

The study of risks determination and mental responses

to their occurrence

© N.N. Gubanov

1

, N.I. Gubanov

2

, A.E. Volkov

2

1

Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, 105005, Russia

2

Tyumen State Medical University

,

Tyumen, 625023, Russia

The article emphasizes and characterizes the following internal determinants of risk be-

havior: risk appetite, search for strong sensation, life expectancy, setting for rapid ob-

taining success, low self-control, and courage. We show differences of age regarding

appetite for risk. Norms and expectations formed by the family, social groups and culture

type are ascribed to the external determinants of risk behavior. As the mental responses

to the occurrence of risks connected with the scientific and technological progress we

highlight a socio-ethical review of the scientific programs and projects, an emergence of

bioethics, a principle of the informed consent to the investigation, a responsibility imper-

ative, an ecological imperative, and a formation of riskology and globalist’s mentality.

Keywords:

risk appetite, search for strong sensation, life expectancy, setting for rapid

obtaining success, low self-control, socio-ethical review, bioethics, responsibility impera-

tive, ecological imperative, riskology

REFERENCES

[1]

Gubanov N.N., Gubanov N.I., Cheremnykh L.G.

Gumanitarnyy vestnik —

Humanities Bulletin,

2017, no. 11.

http://dx.doi.org/10.18698/2306-8477-2017-11-483

[2]

Shaboltas A.V. Riskovannoe povedenie [Risk behavior].

Psikhologiya

[Psychology]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2009, pp. 502–505.

[3]

Efimovskikh V.S.

Riski v sovremennom obshchestve: sotsialno-filosofskiy

analiz.

Diss. kand. filos. nauk [Risks in the contemporary society: socio-

philosophical analysis. Cand. philos. sc. diss.]. Ufa, 2009, 156 p.

[4]

Kon I.

Malchik – otets muzhchiny

[Boy is man’s father]. Moscow, Vremya

Publ., 2009, 704 p.

[5]

Yanykhbash A.V.

Vzaimosvyaz riskovannogo povedeniya s psikhologicheskimi

kharakteristikami lichnosti

. Avtoref. dis. kand. psikhol. nauk [Interrelation

between risk behavior and personal psychological characteristics. Cand. psych.

sc. diss. author's abstract]. Moscow, 2013, 24 p.

[6]

Blackburn R.

The Psychology of Criminal Conduct: Theory, Research and Practice.

Wiley Series in Clinical psychology, 1998, 514 p. [In Russ.: Blackburn R.

Psikhologiya kriminalnogo povedeniya.

St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2004, 496 p.].

[7]

Tsaregorodtsev G.I., Shingarov G.Kh., Gubanov N.I.

Istoriya i filosofiya nauki

[History and philosophy of science]. Moscow, SGU Publ., 2014, 461 p.

[8]

Shaboltas A.V.

Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta Ser. 12. Sotsiologiya —

Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology,

2014, no. 3, pp. 5–16.

[9]

Stoner J. Risky and cautious shifts and group decisions.

Journal of

Experimental and Social Psychology,

1968, vol. 4, pp. 442–459.

[10]

Tischenko P.D.

Filosofskie nauki — Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences,

2010, no. 12, pp. 42–49.