Socio-philosophical origins of the postcapitalism concept by N. Srnicek and A. Williams: methodological aspect
Authors: Kravchenko A.L. | Published: 09.01.2023 |
Published in issue: #6(98)/2022 | |
DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2022-6-817 | |
Category: The Humanities in Technical University | Chapter: Philosophy Science | |
Keywords: accelerationism, postcapitalism, digital platforms, neo-liberalism, speculative realism, postoperaism, non-philosophy, posthumanism, social theory |
The paper reveals theoretical foundations of the postcapitalism (left accelerationism) concept in the works of N. Srnicek and A. Williams. The concept evolution is characterized, which resulted in left accelerationism transformation into the postcapitalism. The concept explicit and implicit socio-philosophical foundations are analyzed. The explicit foundations should include the Cyber Culture Research Unit, in particular N. Land and M. Fischer. It is shown, how, through the works by M. Fischer, the authors accept and process the cultural postmodernism of F. Jameson. The explicit origins include the figure of R. Brassier, as well as the problems of speculative realism in general, thanks to which N. Srnicek in his early works referred to the “non-philosophy” by F. Laruelle, the most implicit theoretical and methodological basis. The key role of the concepts by G. Deleuze and F. Guattari is revealed. Postcapitalism in the context of the current labor theory takes the role of continuation of the postoperaism, a modern trend in the Western Marxism. The concept posthumanistic aspect is identified, according to which transformation from capitalism to postcapitalism is accompanied by transition to the posthuman civilization.
References
[1] Srnicek N., Williams A. Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World without Work. Verso Books, 2015 [In Russ.: Srnicek N., Williams A. Izobretaya buduschee: postkapitalizm i mir bez truda. Moscow, Strelka Press Publ., 2019, 336 p.].
[2] Srnicek N. Termin «akseleratsionizm» stal bespoleznym [The term accelerationalism became useless]. Logos, 2018, no. 2, pp. 87–102.
[3] Land N. Kibergotika. Sochineniya v 6 t. T. 2 [Cybergothic. Collection of works in 6 vols. Vol. 2]. Perm, Gile Press, 2018, 208 p.
[4] Fisher M. Capitalist Realism. Zero Books, 2009 [In Russ.: Kapitalisticheskiy realizm. Moscow, Ultrakultura 2.0 Publ., 2010, 144 p.].
[5] Jameson F. The Seeds of Time. New York, Columbia University Press, 1996, 214 p.
[6] Pavlov A.V. Postmodernistskiy gen: yavlyaetsya li postkapitalizm postpostmodernizmom? [The postmodern gene: does post-capitalism mean postmodernism?]. Logos, 2019, no. 2, pp. 1–24.
[7] Fisher M. Postcapitalist Desire: The Final Lectures. London, Repeater Books, 2021, 264 p.
[8] Lyotard J.-F. Libidinal Economy. Indiana University Press, 1993 [In Russ.: Liotar Zh.-F. Libidinalnaya ekonomika. Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Gaydar Institute Publ., SpBSU Faculty of Arts and Sciences, 2018, 472 p.].
[9] Karstens D., Land N. Vvedenie v giperverie. Intervyu [Introduction to hyperbelief. Interview]. Logos, 2019, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 255–264.
[10] Negarestani R. Cyclonopedia: Complicity with Anonymous Materials (Anomaly). Re.press, 2008 [In Russ.: Negarestani R. Tsiklonopediya: souchastie s anonimnymi materialami. Moscow, Nosorog Publ., 2019, 272 p.].
[11] Williams A., Srnicek N. Accelerate manifesto for an accelerationist politics. Critical Legal Thinking, 14 May 2013 [In Russ.: Uilyams A., Srnichek N. Manifest akseleratsionistskoy politiki. Logos, 2018, no. 2, pp. 7–20].
[12] Brassier R. Accelerationism: Ray Brassier. Moskvax. Available at: https://moskvax.wordpress.com/2010/09/30/accelerationism-ray-brassier/ (accessed February 19, 2022).
[13] Aronson O.V. Affekt v koordinatakh nefilosofii [Affect within the coordinates of non-philosophy]. Filosofskiy zhurnal — Philosophy Journal, 2015, no. 1, pp. 33–46.
[14] Laruelle F. The Degrowth of Philosophy. From Decision to Heresy. Falmouth, New York, Urbanomic/Sequence Press, 2012, pp. 327–349.
[15] Laruelle F. Introduction to Non-Marxism. Minneapolis, Univocal, 2015, 198 p.
[16] Morozov A.V. Navigatsiya po akseleratsionizmu: ot nekapitalizma k postkapitalizmu cherez platformy [Navigating accelerationism: from non-capitalism to postcapitalism via platforms]. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 2019, no. 2, pp. 226–242.
[17] Srnicek N. Capitalism and the Non-Philosophical Subject. The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism. Melbourne, Re.press, 2011, pp. 164–181.
[18] Brassier R. Nihil Unbound: Enlightenment and Extinction. London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, 275 p.
[19] Meillassoux Q. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. Continuum Publ., 2010 [In Russ.: Posle konechnosti: Esse o neobkhodimosti kontingentnosti. Ekaterinburg, Moscow, Kabinetnyi Uchenyi Publ., 2017, 196 p.].
[20] Brassier R. Concepts and Objects in the Speculative Turn: Continental Realism and Materialism. Melbourne, Re-press, 2011 [In Russ.: Brassye R. Ponyatiya i obyekty. Logos, 2017, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 227–262].
[21] Deleuze G., Guattari F. What is Philosophy? Columbia University Press, 1991 [In Russ.: Delez. Zh., Gvattari F. Chto takoe filosofiya? Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Institute of Experimental Sociology, Aleteya Publ., 1998, 288 p.].
[22] Laruelle F. Response to Deleuze. Pli, 2009, no. 20, pp. 138–164.
[23] Kerimov T. Ne-filosofiya i predely filosofii: Zh. Delez i F. Laryuel [Non-philosophy and the limits of philosophy: G. Deleuze and F. Laruelle]. Filosofskiy zhurnal — Philosophy Journal, 2022, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 64–79.
[24] Hardt M., Negri A. Empire. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2000 [In Russ.: Khardt M., Negri A. Imperiya. Moscow, Praksis Publ., 2004, 440 p.].
[25] Shalaginov D. Antiproizvodstvo buduschego (nedovolstvo texnospinozizmom) [Anti-production of future (discontent with technospinosism)]. Neprikosnovennyi zapas. Debaty o politike i kulture — Emergency Ration. Debates on Politics and Culture, 2020, no. 1, pp. 136–152.
[26] Berardi F. Accelerationism questions from the point of view of the body. e-flux, 2013, no. 46 [In Russ.: Problematiziruya akseleratsionizm s tochki zreniya tela. Logos, 2018, no. 2, pp. 117–124.].
[27] Vinciguerra L. Renaissance du spinozisme français: 1950–2000 [In Russ.: Spinozistskiy renessans vo Frantsii (1950–2000). Vvedenie. Logos, 2007, no. 2, pp. 6–28].
[28] Hardt M., Negri A. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. Penguin Books, 2004 [In Russ.: Mnozhestvo: voyna i demokratiya v epokhu imperii, Moscow, Kulturnaya Revolyutsiya Publ, 2006, 559 p.].
[29] Negarestani R. The Labor of the Inhuman. Falmouth: Urbanomic, 2014 [In Russ.: Rabota nechelovecheskogo. Logos, 2021, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1–38.].
[30] Davydov D. A. Postkapitalizm i rozhdenie personaliata [Postcapitalism and the birth of personaliat]. Moscow, RIPOL Klassik Publ., 2021, 336 p.