Dialogic nature of philosophical knowledge and the possibility of teaching philosophy

The meeting points of philosophical, humanitarian and natural-scientific knowledge are indicated and it is shown how the harmony of various scientific worldviews can be expressed in the pedagogical process. It is stated that the advantage of philosophy as an intellectual practice lies in its principal orientation to understanding the human position in the world, in its unindifference to the fate of civilization and culture. In addition, philosophy always grows out of concrete historical conditions and its conclusions are decisively influenced by the personality of the creator. Nevertheless, philosophy and natural science knowledge mutually use each other’s achievements and this should be emphasized in the pedagogical process.

References
[1] Bryzgalina E.V. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 4: Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya — Science Journal of Volgograd State University. History. Area Studies. International Relations, 2013, no. 1 (23), pp. 162–169.
[2] Gardner H. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York, Basic Books Publ., 1983 [In Russ.: Gardner H. Struktura razuma: teoriya mnozhestvennogo intellekta. Moscow, I.D. Vilyames Publ., 2007, 512 p.].
[3] Vygotsky L.S. Pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya [Pedagogical psychology]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1991, 480 p.
[4] Chernogortseva G.V. Invariantnaya sostavlyaushchaya obrazovatelnykh tekhnologiy [Invariant component of educational technologies]. Sovremennye gumanitarnye tekhnologii i ikh ispolzovanie v sisteme gumanitarnoy podgotovki inzhenerov. Materialy II Vserossiyskoy nauchno-metodicheskoy konferentsii [Current humanitarian technologies and their use in the system of humanitarian training of engineers. Proceedings of the II All-Russian Scientific and Methodological Conference]. Moscow, BMSTU Publ., 2010, pp. 452-454.
[5] Berdyaev N.A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kultury i iskusstva [Philosophy of creative work, culture and art]. In 2 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1994, 541 p.
[6] Camus A. L’homme Révolté. Paris, Les Éditions Gallimard Publ., 1951, 382 p. [In Russ.: Camus A. Buntuyushchiy chelovek. Filosofiya. Politika. Iskusstvo. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1990, 415 p.].
[7] Heidegger M. Being and Time. London, SCM Press Publ., 1962 [In Russ.: Heidegger M. Vremya i bytie: Statyi i vystupleniya. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1993, 447 p.].
[8] Heidegger M. Elucidations of Hölderlin’s Poetry. Humanity Books Publ., 2000 [In Russ.: Heidegger M. Razyasneniya k poezii Gelderlina. St. Petersburg, Akademicheskij proekt Publ., 2003, 321 p.].
[9] Dashkevich V.S. Velikoe kulturnoe odichanie [The great cultural dehumanization]. Moscow, Russian CHESS House Publ., 2013, 720 p.
[10] Losev A.F. Estetika Vozrozhdeniya. Istoricheskiy smysl estetiki Vozrozhdeniya [The Renaissance aesthetic. The historical meaning of the Renaissance aesthetics]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1998, 750 p.