Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary space of modern science

In contrast to New times, production affects science through mediating links or bypassing technology. One of the essential aspects of the scientific and technical revolution is the widespread introduction of the results of scientific knowledge in the material, manufacturing and socio-economic spheres of public production. The possibility of such interpenetration was prepared by their initial mutual reliance. The process of emergence of a single system of science-technology-production-market-society has revealed a number of problems. One of them is the discrepancy between the disciplinary organization of scientific knowledge and the nature of practical problems that need to be addressed by modern science. This discrepancy can be eliminated by expanding interdisciplinary research. This is not only a change in the science study interest scope, but also evidence of ongoing transformations within the science itself. The noted trends in the development of modern interdisciplinary research and the types of integration of modern science are also associated with the growth of humanization of modern natural science, with awareness of its creators of the implications for the life of society, of the need for dialogue with nature and themselves.

References
[1] Aleshin, A.I. Biologizatorstvo i sotsiologizatorstvo: metodologicheskiy analiz [Biologization and sociologization: methodological analysis]. In: Biologiya v poznanii cheloveka [Biology in human cognition]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1989, pp. 150–171.
[2] Leykin E.G. Sistema mekhanicheskogo proizvodstva i ee mesto v istorii tsivilizatsii [The system of mechanical production and its place in the civilization history]. In: Mekhanika i tsivilizatsiya XVII–XIX vv. [Mechanics and civilization of the XVII–XIX centuries]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1979, p. 419.
[3] Aleshin A.I. Osobennosti razvitiya integratsionnogo protsessa v sovremennoy nauke [Features of integrative process development in modern science]. In: Filisofiya, estestvoznanie, NTR [Philosophy, natural science, STR]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1986, pp. 123–134.
[4] Dmitriev I.S. Osobennosti razvitiya khimii v XVI–XVII vv. [Features of the chemistry development in the XVI–XVII centuries]. In: Stanovlenie khimii kak nauki [The formation of chemistry as a science]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1983, p. 17.
[5] Newton I. Opticks or, a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections, and Colours of Light. London, William Publ., 1730, 416 p. [In Russ.: Newton I. Optica ili traktat ob otrazheniyakh, prelomleniyakh, izgibaniyakh i tsvetakh sveta. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo tekhniko-teoreticheskoy literatury Publ., 1954, p. 299.
[6] Mirsky E.M. Mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya [Interdisciplinary Studies]. In: Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya [New Philosophical Encyclopedia] In 4 volumes. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 2001, vol. 2, p. 518.
[7] Kasavin I.T. Mezhdistsiplinarnost [Interdisciplinarity]. In: Entsiklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki [Encyclopedia of epistemology and philosophy of science]. Moscow, “Canon+”, ROOI “Reabilitation” Publ., 2009, pp. 478–481.
[8] Gott V.S., Ursul A.D., Semenyuk E.P. Kategorii sovremennoy nauki: stanovlenie i razvitie [Categories of modern science: the formation and development]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1985, pp. 114–122.
[9] Timofeev-Resovsky I.V., Vorontsov N.N., Yablokov A.V. Kratkiy ocherk teorii evolutsii [An outline of the evolution theory]. Ekaterinburg, Tokmak-Press Publ., 2009, 240 p.
[10] Kalinin E.Yu., Lyuskin M.B. Gumanitarnyy vestnik — Humanities Bulletin of BMSTU, 2018, no. 3 (65). DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2018-3-509
[11] Klyucharev G.A., Didenko D.V., Latov Yu.V., Latova N.V., Sheregi F.E. Obrazovanie, nauka i biznes v sozdanii intellektualoemkikh sred [Education, science and business in the creation of intellectual environments]. St Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 2016, p. 17.
[12] Gorokhov V.G. Evolutsiya inzhenerii: ot prostoty k slozhnosti [The evolution of engineering: from simplicity to complexity]. Moscow, IF RAS Publ., 2015, p. 169.