Some features of the semantical strategy of substantiation of the scientific theory
Authors: Arkhiereev N.L. | Published: 09.10.2018 |
Published in issue: #9(71)/2018 | |
DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2018-9-553 | |
Category: The Humanities in Technical University | Chapter: Philosophy Science | |
Keywords: theory, multitude, model, standard formalization, semantics |
The standard treatment of the scientific theory, as accepted in the methodology of the logical positivism, believed theory to be a set of correct formal statements (formulas) that had been deducted from one another. The fundamental laws of theory were stated in a special theoretical language and were treated as axioms of the theory. The consequences of those laws that could have been checked empirically were recorded in a separate language of observable values, and the correlation between the glossaries stated above were provided with the special rules of accordance. The alternative set-theoretic strategy of scientific theory’s analysis considered the linguistic formulation of the theory to be unimportant and mainly concentrated on the description of the proper set of theory models. The article is devoted to the methodological principles of the so called semantical strategy of analysis of the scientific knowledge – one of the most well-known versions of set-theoretic strategy
References
[1] Suppes P. A Comparison of the Meaning and Use of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences. The Concept and the Role of the Model in Mathematics and Natural and Social Sciences. Dordrecht, Reidel, 1961, рр. 163–177.
[2] Suppes P. Introduction to Logic. Princeton, Van Nostrand, 1957, 330 р.
[3] Suppes P. Measurement, Empirical Meaningfulness and Three-valued Logic. Measurement: Definitions and Theories. New York, Wiley, 1959, рр. 129–143.
[4] Suppes P. Models of Data. Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1962, рр. 252–261.
[5] Suppes P. Philosophical Implications of Tarski’s Work. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1988, no. 53, рр. 80–91.
[6] Van Fraassen B. Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective. New York, Oxford University Press, 2008, 408 p.
[7] Van Fraassen B. The Scientific Image. New York, Oxford University Press, 1980, 248 p.
[8] Suppe F. The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism. Urbana, University of Illinois Press, 1989, 485 р.
[9] Suppe F. What’s wrong with the received view on the structure of scientific theories? Philosophy of Science, 1972, no. 39, рр. 1–19.
[10] Birkhoff G., Von Neiman J. The Logic of Quantum Mechanics. The Annals of Mathematics, 1936, 2nd Ser, vol. 37, no. 4, рр. 823–843.