Bifurcation model of the historical process: philosophical analysis

The paper considers a bifurcation model of the historical process. It identifies basic provisions of this model. A number of key cognitive problems arising within the framework of the model are studied. They include the problem of finding a basic category acceptable for a significant part of historians and philosophers, the problem of determining time intervals between the different bifurcation points and the question of the influence degree of a historical figure in the past bifurcation states. The paper proposes solutions to these problems. It notes the need for further analysis of the theoretical and methodological problems within the framework of the bifurcation model.

EDN DARIUB

References
[1] Nekhamkin V.A. Alternativy proshlogo v filosofii istorii (teoretiko-metodologicheskiy analiz). Avtoref. dis. … d-ra filos. nauk [Alternatives of the past in the philosophy of history (theoretical and methodological analysis). Author’s abstract ... Dr. Sc. (Philosophy)]. 09.00.11. Moscow, BMSTU, 2008, 32 p.
[2] Nekhamkin V.A. Neklassicheskie modeli obshchestvennoy dinamiki v sotsialnom poznanii XX — nachala XXI vv.: itogi i perspektivy razvitiya [Non-classical models of social dynamics in social cognition of the 20th — early 21st centuries: results and development prospects]. Sotsium i vlast — Society and Power, 2020, no. 3, pp. 18−29.
[3] Machiavelli N. Istorie Fiorentine, 1532 [In Russ.: Makiavelli N. Istoriya Florentsii. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1973, 440 p.].
[4] Laszlo E. The Age of Bifurcation. Understanding the Changing World. Gordon and Breach, 1991 [In Russ.: Laslo E. Vek bifurkatsii. Postizhenie izmenyayushchegosya mira. Put, 1995, no. 7, pp. 3−125].
[5] Gefter M.Ya. Iz tekh i etikh let [From those and these years]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1991, 506 p.
[6] Mogilnitskiy B.G. Alternativnost v istorii sovetskogo obshchestva [Alter nativity in the history of Soviet society]. Voprosy istorii — Questions of History, 1989, no. 11, pp. 3–18.
[7] Inozemtsev V.L. Alternativnost obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Alternative social development]. Vestnik MGU, Seriya 6 Ekonomika — Moscow University Economics Bulletin, 1991, no. 2, pp. 3–10.
[8] Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy [Complete collection of works]. In 55 vols. Vol. 29. Moscow, Politicheskoy Literatury Publ., 1969, 782 p.
[9] Wallerstein I. World-Systems Analysis. An Introduction. Duke University Press, Durham and London, 2004 [In Russ.: Vallerstayn I. Mirosistemnyi analiz. Vvedenie. Moscow, URSS, LENAND Publ., 2018, 304 p.].
[10] Nazaretyan A.P. Znaet li istoriya soslagatelnoe naklonenie? (Megaistoricheskiy vzglyad na alternativnye modeli) [Does history know the subjunctive mood? (A mega-historical look at the alternative models)]. Filosofskie nauki — Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 2005, no. 2, pp. 7–18.
[11] Zhurov Yu.V. Problemy metodologii istorii [Problems of methodology in history]. Bryansk, Bryansk Bryansk State University Publ., 1996, 144 p.
[12] Gurevich A.Ya., ed. Odissey. Chelovek v istorii. Istoriya v soslagatelnom naklonenii? [Odysseus. Man in History. History in the subjunctive mood?]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2000, 344 p.
[13] Karasuba I.V., Kurukin I.V., Sokolov N.P. Vybiraya svoyu istoriyu. “Razvilki” na puti Rossii: ot Ryurikovichey do oligarkhov [Choosing your history. “Forks” in the Russia’s path: from the Rurikovichs to the oligarchs]. Moscow, KoLibri Publ., 2005, 638 p.
[14] Vorozheykina T.E. Glyadya nazad: vozmozhnye alternativy v razvitii perestroyki [Looking back: possible alternatives in the development of Perestroika]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost — Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 2005, no. 5, pp. 17–22.
[15] Galkin A.A., Kotov V.N., Krasin Yu.A., Menshikov S.M. Kapitalizm segodnya: paradoksy razvitiya [Capitalism today: paradoxes in development]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1989, 315 p.
[16] Leshchenko V. Vetvyashcheesya vremya. Istoriya, kotoroy ne bylo [Branching time: the history that never was]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2003, 588 p.
[17] Modestov S.A. Bytie nesvershivshegosya [The being of the unfulfilled]. Moscow, Moskovskiy Obshchestvennyi Nauchnyi Fond Publ., 2000, 176 p.
[18] Popov V., Shmelev N. Na razvilke dorog. Byla li alternativa stalinskoy modeli razvitiya? [At a fork in the road. Was there an alternative to the Stalinist development model?]. Osmyslit kult Stalina — Understanding the Cult of Stalin. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1989, pp. 284–326.
[19] Nekhamkin V.A. Kontrfakticheskie istoricheskie issledovaniya i sinergetika (Puti vzaimodeystviya) [Counterfactual historical research and synergetics (paths to interaction). Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost — Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 2006, no. 5, pp. 120–129.
[20] ХХ vek: alternativy razvitiya (materialy “kruglogo stola”) [The 20th century: development alternatives (materials of the round table)]. Rabochiy klass i sovremennyi mir — Working class and the modern world, 1989, no. 1, pp. 60–71.
[21] Vozmozhny li matematicheskie modeli istorii? [Are the mathematical models of history possible?]. “Kruglyi stol” uchenykh. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost — “Round table of the scientist”. Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 2004, no. 3, pp. 111–122.
[22] Kapitsa S.P., Kurdyumov S.P., Malinetskiy G.G. Sinergetika i prognozy budushchego [Synergetics and future forecasts]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1997, 285 p.
[23] A chto, esli by?..: Alternativnaya istoriya [What if?..: Alternative history]. Moscow, AST Publ.; St.-Petersburg, Terra Fantastica Publ., 2002, 604 p.
[24] Grechko P.K. Konceptualnye modeli istorii [Conceptual models of history]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 1995, 144 p.
[25] Kostomarov N.I. Smutnoe vremya Moskovskogo gosudarstva v nachale XVII stoletiya. 1604–1613 gg. [The time of troubles of the Moscow State at the beginning of the 17th century. 1604–1613]. Moscow, Charli Publ., 1994, 799 p.
[26] Nekhamkin V.A., Nekhamkin A.N., Firsanova E.V. Kratomaniya: opyt teoreticheskogo (sotsialno-filosofskogo) osmysleniya [Cratomania: the experience of theoretical (socio-philosophical) understanding]. Gumanitarny vestnik — Humanities Bulletin of BMSTU, 2021, iss. 6. Available at: https://hmbul.bmstu.ru/catalog/hum/phil/752.html (accessed October 20, 2024).
[27] Serebryannikov V.V. Sotsiologiya voyny [Sociology of war]. Moscow, Nauchnyi Mir Publ., 1997, 398 p.
[28] Chernogortseva G.V. Chelovek v filosofskom diskurse: k istorii idey [The Man in philosophical discourse: on history of ideas]. Gumanitarny vestnik — Humanities Bulletin of BMSTU, 2015, iss. 9. Available at: http://hmbul.bmstu.ru/catalog/hum/phil/288.html (accessed October 19, 2024).
[29] Nekhamkin V.A. Sinergetika i sovremennoe istoricheskoe poznanie: vozmozhnosti i predely [Synergetic and modern historical knowledge: possibilities and limits]. Elektronnyi nauchno-obrazovatelnyi zhurnal “Istoriya” — Istoriya, 2015, no. 7. Available at: https://history.jes.su/s207987840001222-3-1 (accessed October 19, 2024).