10 / 11
Н.В. Бруяка, Н.Г. Багдасарьян
10
Innovation in development strategies:
formation of a new field of science
©N.V. Bruyaka
1
, N.G. Bagdasaryan
2
1
Dubna International University, Dubna, 141980, Russia
2
Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, 105005, Russia
The paper looks into the process of formation of a new field of social science, innovation
science. The authors are interested in objectives and the outlook of the new science, they
are inspired by considerable hopefully positive impact it may have on the development of
civilisation and exciting opportunities of further comprehensive research of innovation
activity such impact necessitates, and especially by exploring its challenges. The article
provides thorough investigation into modern approaches to the study of innovation, giv-
ing a particular attention to socio-philosophical one. The authors have tried and proved
the need of further in-depth study of the field in order to reveal the way intrinsic factors
underlying civilisation development correlate with each other.
Keywords:
innovation, innovation activity, innovation science, social and philosophical
approach, communicative space, institutional status.
REFERENCES
[1] Leont’ev D.A.
Sovremennaya psikhologiya motivatsii
[Modern psychology of
motivation]. Moscow, Smy’sl Publ., 2002, 297 p.
[2] Lapin N.I.
Teoriya i praktika innovatiki
[Theory and Practice of Innovation].
Moscow, Logos Publ., 2008, 328 p.
[3] Bagdasaryan N.G. Kulturologiya v sisteme sovremennogo znaniya. [Cultural
Studies in the modern knowledge]. In:
Kulturologiya
[Cultural Studies]. Mos-
cow, Yurait Publ., 2014, pp. 23–59.
[4] Yagolkovskiy S.R.
Psihologiya innovacii: podkhody, modeli, processy
. [Psy-
chology of innovation: approaches, models, processes]. Moscow, The Publish-
ing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2011, 240 p.
[5] Drucker P.F.
Biznes i innovacii
. [Innovation and Entrepreneurship]. Moscow,
Williams Publ., 2007, 432 p.
[6] Bagdasaryan N.G. K voprosu o kharaktere nauki: ne differentsirovat’, a integri-
rovat’ [On the issue of the nature of science: not differentiating but integrating].
Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki — Epistemology and Philosophy of Science
,
2014, no. 2, pp. 44–49.
[7] Mirskij E.M. Mezhdisciplinarnye issledovaniya [Interdisciplinary Studies]. Sty-
opin V.S., red.
Novaya filosofskaya enciklopediya
[New Encyclopedia of Phi-
losophy]. Vol. 4. Dictionary. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 2010, 736 p.
[8] Pohl C., Hadorn G.H.
Principles for designing transdisciplinary research
. Mu-
nich, Oekom, 2007, 169 p.
[9] El’kina E.E. Metodologicheskie problemy innovacionnoy deyatelnosti [Meth-
odological problems of innovation activity].
Bibliosfera. — Bibliosphere
, 2008,
no. 4, pp. 10–14.
[10] Starostin A.M.
Filosofskie innovacii v kognitivnom i prakseologicheskom
kontekste
[Philosophical innovations in cognitive and praxeological context].
Moscow, Librocom Publ., 2013, 368 p.
[11] Agranovich V.B.
Soderzhanie ponyatiya “innovatsiya” kak social’no-
filosofskoy kategorii
[The concept of "innovation" as a socio-philosophical
category].
Izvestiya Tomskogo politehnicheskogo universiteta. — The Bulletin
of Tomsk Polytechnic University
, 2008, no. 6, pp. 111–113.