Nonlinear dynamics and experience of logical reconstruction of knowledge formation
Authors: Kaganov Yu.T., Oseledchik M.B. | Published: 05.11.2021 |
Published in issue: #5(91)/2021 | |
DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2021-5-747 | |
Category: Scientific reports | |
Keywords: stochastic fractal, nonlinear dynamical system, attractor, human brain, concept, predicate, metagraphs, fuzzy logic, semiotic structure, reconstruction of knowledge formation |
The paper focuses on the individual, his brain and cognitive abilities as stochastic fractals due to the biological determination of the structure of the human body and the human brain using DNA and socio-cultural determination of the basic cognitive set transmitted to each individual, which he perceives and uses for further life. The relationship between the individual and paradigmatic content of culture is nonlinear and dynamic, there is a constant process of diffusion, mutual enrichment, and mutual opposition of cognitive elements. The emerging system of knowledge is nonequilibrium, dynamic, self-sustaining, self-organizing and has the properties of openness, nonlinearity, and dissipation. The development of knowledge, cognition, and language is a co-evolutionary process. Having accumulated an array of visual-figurative, semi-structured, implicit, non-verbalized primary knowledge about the environment for the pragmatic purposes of survival of society and communication of group members, the community develops means of non-linguistic and then linguistic communication. Important objects of the environment are given names that become intersubjective. As a result, a primary conceptual apparatus is developed, based on denotations, their properties, and relations with other denotations. In this case, a nonlinear dynamic semiotic structure appears that stimulates thought processes due to its internal semantic connections. This structure has a non-linear way of organizing in the form of a complex of interconnected graph-trees, which are combined into meta-graphs, which then turn into attractors for the implementation of intelligent procedures. Therefore, the basic conceptual apparatus of society can be represented by means of fuzzy logic, and thought processes can be modeled by means of soft computing.
References
[1] Gurova L.L. Intuitsiya i logika v psikhologicheskoy strukture resheniya zadach [Intuition and logic in the psychological structure of problem solving]. In: A.A. Sokolov, L.L. Gurova, N.I. Zhinkin, eds. Semantika, logika i intuitsiya v myslitelnoy deyatelnosti cheloveka. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Semantics, logic and intuition in human mental activity. Psychological research]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1979, pp. 8–45.
[2] Sergeev K.A., Slinin Ya.A. Mnogomernost struktury nauchnogo znaniya. Struktura i razvitie nauchnogo znaniya [Multidimensionality of the structure of scientific knowledge. The structure and development of scientific knowledge]. Sistemny podkhod k metodologii nauki. Materialy VIII Vsesoyuznoy konferentsii «Logika i metodologiia nauki» (Vilnyus, 1982) [A systematic approach to the methodology of science. Proceedings of the VIII All-Union Conference “Logic and Methodology of Science” (Vilnius, 1982)]. Moscow, VNII sist. issled. Publ., 1982, pp. 190–193.
[3] Rozov M.A. O raznykh podkhodakh k analizu znaniy. Struktura i razvitie nauchnogo znaniya [On different approaches to the analysis of knowledge. The structure and development of scientific knowledge]. Sistemny podkhod k metodologii nauki. Materialy VIII Vsesoyuznoy konferentsii «Logika i metodologiya nauki» (Vilnyus, 1982) [A systematic approach to the methodology of science. Proceedings of VIII All-Union Conference “Logic and Methodology of Science” (Vilnius, 1982)]. Moscow, VNII sist. issled. Publ., 1982, pp. 23–26.
[4] Olitskiy A.A. Ierarkhichnost struktur v deyatelnosti mozga i nekotorye problemy metodologii nauki. Struktura i razvitie nauchnogo znaniya [The hierarchy of structures in the activity of the brain and some problems of the methodology of science. The structure and development of scientific knowledge]. Sistemny podkhod k metodologii nauki. Materialy VIII Vsesoyuznoy konferentsii «Logika i metodologiya nauki» (Vilnyus, 1982) [A systematic approach to the methodology of science.Proceedings of VIII All-Union Conference “Logic and Methodology of Science” (Vilnius, 1982)]. Moscow, VNII sist. issled. Publ., 1982, pp. 200–202.
[5] Petrov V.V. Yazyk i logicheskaya teoriya: v poiskakh novoy paradigmy [Language and logical theory: in search of a new paradigm]. In: Yazyk i logicheskaya teoriya [Language and logical theory]. Moscow, Tsentr. sovet filosof. (metodolog.) sem. pri Prez. AN SSSR Publ., 1987, pp. 15–20.
[6] Mouloud N. L’analyse et le sens. Payot, 1976, 335 p. [In Russ.: Mouloud N. Analiz i smysl. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1979, 348 p.].
[7] Zhinkin N.I. Voprosy yazykoznaniya — Topics in the study of language, 1964, no. 5, pp. 26–38.
[8] Zhinkin N.I. Grammatika i smysl [Grammar and meaning]. In: Yazyk i chelovek. Vyp. 4 [Language and man. No. 4]. Moscow, MSU Publ., 1970, pp. 63–85.
[9] Novikov A.I. Issledovanie protsessa smyslovogo preobrazovaniya teksta [Research of the process of semantic transformation of text]. In: A.A. Sokolov, L.L. Gurova, N.I. Zhinkin, eds. Semantika, logika i intuitsiya v myslitelnoy deyatelnosti cheloveka. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Semantics, logic and intuition in human mental activity. Psychological research]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1979, pp. 127–147.