The Significance of the Discipline “History and Philosophy of Science” for the Formation of a Scientist

The indispensable role of the discipline “History and Philosophy of Science” in helping postgraduate students address existential problems and achieve successful self-realization is demonstrated. Two main theses are presented. First, in an existential dimension, the discipline “History and Philosophy of Science” performs a crucial and irreplaceable psychotherapeutic function for the scientific community, especially for its younger and more inquisitive members. Second, this discipline represents the self-awareness of science as a special form of culture. It is shown that “History and Philosophy of Science” is the result of productive interaction between philosophy and science: philosophy helps scientists resolve worldview-related existential issues and determine directions for productive scientific inquiry, while scientists provide philosophers with concrete and reliable knowledge that serves as the basis for philosophical constructions. It is noted that teaching this discipline creates broad opportunities for the use of problem-based learning methods and enhances both the self-esteem and the sense of pedagogical significance among instructors themselves. A brief overview of the development of this discipline in Russia is provided. Various challenges in teaching “History and Philosophy of Science” are characterized, and possible ways to address them are proposed.

EDN FKQLCG

References
[1] Medvedev na vopros o nizkikh zarplatakh uchiteley: idite v biznes [Medvedev, responding to a question about low teachers’ salaries, advised: “Go into business”]. Gazeta.ru. Available at: https://www.gazeta.ru/business/news/2016/08/03/n_8953517.shtml?updated (accessed January 23, 2026).
[2] Bacon F. Novyy organon [New Organon]. Sochineniya. [Works]. In 2 vols., vol. 2. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1978, pp. 5–214.
[3] Collins R. Sotsiologiya filosofiy: globalnaya teoriya intellektualnogo izmeneniya [The sociology of philosophies: a global theory of intellectual change]. Novosibirsk, Sibirskiy khronograf Publ., 2002, 1280 p.
[4] Gubanov N.N. Ponimat nauku, chtoby v nee verit. Retsenziya na knigu: Lebedev S.A. Vvedenie v filosofiyu nauki: 15 lektsiy [Understanding science in order to believe in it. Review of the book: Lebedev S.A. Introduction to the philosophy of science: 15 lectures]. Sovremennye filosofskie issledovaniya — Modern Philosophical Studies, 2024, no. 3. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ponimat-nauku-chtoby-v-neyo-verit-retsenziya-na-knigu-lebedev-s-a-vvedenie-v-filosofiyu-nauki-15-lektsiy-m-prospekt-2024-352-s (accessed January 23, 2026).
[5] Lebedev S.A. Vvedenie v filosofiyu nauki: 15 lektsiy [Introduction to the philosophy of science: 15 lectures]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2024, 352 p.
[6] Carnap R. Filosofskie osnovaniya fiziki [Philosophical foundations of physics]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1971, 390 p.
[7] Kuhn T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy [The structure of scientific revolutions]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1975, 288 p.
[8] Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie [Theoretical knowledge]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2003, 744 p.
[9] Gubanov N.N., Yusipov E.A., Gubanov N.I. Osobennosti prepodavaniya filosofii studentam estestvennonauchnykh i tekhnicheskikh spetsial’nostey [Features of teaching philosophy to students of natural science and technical specialities]. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshey shkoly), 2021, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.01-21.027
[10] Gubanov N.N., Gubanov N.I. Istoriya nauchnykh idey skvoz prizmu idey filosofskikh [The history of scientific ideas through the prism of philosophical ideas]. Dialog so vremenem, 2021, no. 76. https://doi.org/10.21267/AQUILO.2021.76.76.026