“The Privilege of Backwardness” and the Challenges of Modernization: Narodnichestvo through the Methodology of A. Walicki

Interpretations of Narodnichestvo proposed by the outstanding Polish historian of Russian philosophy, Andrzej Walicki, were analyzed. The main source of the study is represented by the book “The Controversy over Capitalism: Studies in the Social Philosophy of the Russian Populists”, which has not been translated into Russian, as well as by his other works. The relevance of the research is determined by a methodological impasse in the study of Narodnichestvo, which is traditionally reduced either to agrarian socialism or to a revolutionary movement, thereby preventing the identification of its genuine philosophical content. The ideas formed within the ideological framework of Narodnichestvo, as interpreted by Andrzej Walicki, were examined and reconsidered. The methodological approach of the Warsaw School of the History of Ideas was employed, within which the reconstruction of the immanent logic of the development of philosophical concepts in their cultural and social context is carried out. Through the application of this method, Narodnichestvo is reconstructed not as a socio-economic doctrine or a political practice, but as an integral philosophy of history. It is demonstrated that Narodnichestvo constitutes an attempt to respond to the challenges of modernization in a peripheral country, within which a critique of linear progress, the development of the subjective method in sociology, and the search for non-capitalist alternatives of development are combined. It is established that the key features of Walicki’s approach include the analysis of the polemics between Narodnichestvo and Marxism, as well as the identification of the internal connection between the ethical and philosophical foundations of the subjective method and subsequent economic programs. Particular attention is devoted to the analysis of Polish messianism and its influence on Narodnichestvo. It is emphasized that Walicki’s concept allows Narodnichestvo to be interpreted not only as a complex ideological formation, but also as a phenomenon situated within the broader European context of debates on progress, whereby Russian philosophy is presented as an integral part of world philosophy. It is concluded that, despite the debatable nature of certain theses, this approach may be considered significant for contemporary scholarship, as it provides a relevant analytical framework for examining the problems of peripheral development under conditions of globalization.

EDN ILOULG

References
[1] Mokshin G.N. Chto takoe narodnichestvo? Materialy k diskussii [What is Narodnichestvo? Materials for discussion]. Vestnik Surgutskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta — Bulletin of Surgut State Pedagogical University, 2020, no. 3, pp. 84–92. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/chto-takoe-narodnichestvo-materialy-k-diskussii (accessed October 20, 2025).
[2] Pipes R. Narodnichestvo: A Semantic Inquiry. Slavic Review, 1964, vol. 23,no. 3, pp. 56–74.
[3] Venturi F. Roots of Revolution: A History of the Populist and Socialist Movements in 19th Century Russia. New York, Alfred A. Knopf, 1960, 736 p.
[4] Kozmin B.P. Iz istorii revolyutsionnoy mysli v Rossii. Izbrannye trudy [From the history of revolutionary thought in Russia. Selected works]. Moscow, Academy of Sciences Press, 1961, 410 p.
[5] Walicki A. The Flow of Ideas. Russian Thought from the Enlightenment to the Religious-Philosophical Rennaisance. Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang, 2015, 584 p.
[6] Walicki A. The Controversy over Capitalism: Studies in the Social Philosophy of the Russian Populists. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1969, 234 p.
[7] Lovejoy A. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Harvard University Press, 1936 [In Russ.: Lovejoy A. Velikaya tsep bytiya: Istoriya idey. Moscow, Dom Intellektualnoy knigi Publ., 2001, 372 p.].
[8] Walicki A. On Writing Intellectual History: Leszek Kolakowski and the Warsaw School of the History of Ideas. Critical Philosophy, 1984, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 5–23.
[9] Walicki A. Inoy vzglyad na Rossiyu: Pisma iz “russkogo arkhiva” [A different view of Russia: Letters from the “Russian archive”]. Filosofskiy zhurnal — Phylosophy Journal, 2021, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 167–195.
[10] Maslin M.A. Andzhey Valitskiy kak istorik russkoy filosofii [Andrzej Walicki as a historian of Russian philosophy]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 7. Philosophiya — Moscow University Bulletin. Series 7: Philosophy, 2014, no. 6, pp. 85–97. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/andzhey-valitskiy-kak-istorik-russkoy-filosofii (accessed October 20, 2025).
[11] Kimball A. [Review of the book by Andrzej Walicki]. American Historical Review, 1970, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 842–844.
[12] Walicki A. Philosophy and Romantic Nationalism: The Case of Poland. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1982, 415 p.
[13] Walicki A. Istoriya russkoy mysli ot Prosvescheniya do marksizma [A History of Russian thought from the enlightenment to marxism]. Moscow, Kanon+ Publ., 2013, 480 p.
[14] Walicki A. V krugu konservativnoy utopii: Struktura i metamorfozy russkogo slavyanofilstva [In the circle of conservative utopia: Structure and metamorphoses of Russian slavophilism]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2019, 456 p.
[15] Walicki A. Mesjanizm Adama Mickiewicza a „rosyjski socjalizm” Aleksandra Hercena. Myślą i słowem. Polsko-rosyjski dyskurs ideowy XIX wieku. Warszawa, PISM, 2014, pp. 69–92.
[16] Lavrov P.L. Istoricheskie pisma [Historical letters]. Saint Petersburg, Tipografiya A.M. Kotomina, 1884, 338 p.
[17] Mikhaylovskiy N.K. Chto takoe progress? [What is progress?]. In: Mikhaylovskiy N.K. Geroi i tolpa: izbrannye trudy po sotsiologii [Heroes and the crowd: Selected works on sociology]. In 2 vols. Saint Petersburg, Aleteyya Publ., 1998, vol. 1, pp. 119–171.
[18] Bervi-Flerovskiy V.V. Polozhenie rabochego klassa v Rossii: Nablyudeniya i issledovaniya [The condition of the working class in Russia: Observations and studies]. Saint Petersburg, N.P. Polyakov, 1869, 494 p.
[19] Tkachev P.N. Nedodumannye dumy [Incomplete reflections]. In: Tkachev P.N. Izbrannye sochineniya na sotsialno-politicheskie temy [Selected works on socio-political topics]. In 4 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow, Izdatelstvo Vsesoyuznogo obschestva byvshikh politkatorzhan i ssylnoposelentsev, 1932, pp. 224–257.
[20] Plekhanov G.V. Zakon ekonomicheskogo razvitiya obschestva i zadachi sotsializma v Rossii [The law of economic development of society and the tasks of socialism in Russia]. In: Plekhanov G.V. Sochineniya. T. 1: Statyi do 1883 goda [Works. Vol. 1: Articles before 1883]. Moscow, Leningrad, Gosizdat, 1923, pp. 25–43.
[21] Vorontsov V.P. Sudby kapitalizma v Rossii [The fate of capitalism in Russia]. Saint Petersburg, Tipografiya M.M. Stasyulevicha, 1882, 310 p.
[22] Danielson N.F. Ocherki nashego poreformennogo obschestvennogo khozyaystva [Essays on our post-reform social economy]. Saint Petersburg, Tipografiya M.M. Stasyulevicha, 1893, 353 p.
[23] Shanin T. Late Marx and the Russian Road: Marx and the Peripheries of Capitalism. New York, Monthly Review Press, 1983, 367 p.
[24] Wortman R. [Review of the book by Andrzej Walicki]. The Journal of Modern History, 1970, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 673–676. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1905850 (accessed October 20, 2025).