Philosophy of complexity and problems of transdisciplinarity

The history of science discovers the feedback loops, when complication in scientific knowledge gives rise to new socio-cultural challenges, which, in turn, stimulates growth of the scientific disciplines and science overrunning the boundaries of own subjectivity. Multifactorial problems facing the scientific knowledge could not be solved within the frames of a monodisciplinary approach; there appears a need for a polylogue between the carriers of different disciplinary ontologies. The rise of integration between scientific disciplines and social subsystems to a qualitatively different level made it possible to speak of transdisciplinary synthesis and formation of a transdisciplinary scientific ideal. Transdisciplinary synthesis is one of the “complexity science” characteristics and takes the form of the practical philosophy of complexity. The transdisciplinarity problem was analyzed, and the features of the transdisciplinary discourse features were considered. Transdisciplinarity appears to be a transcending science shift to the realm of lifeworld. In the transdisciplinary discourse development, both the next crisis of science, source of the scientific disciplines synergy and the “scientific mythology” formation stage claiming to be the actual form of the scientific worldview could be noted.

References
[1] Pesotskaya E.N. Multidistsiplinarnost i transdistsiplinarnost v stanovlenii noveishei ratsionalnosti [Multidisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in forming of new rationality]. Epomen – Epomen Scientific Journal, 2021, no. 53, pp. 14–22.
[2] Kiyaschenko L.P., Moiseev V.I. Filosofiya transdistsiplinarnosti [Philosophy of transdisciplinarity]. Moscow, IFRAN Publ., 2009, 205 p.
[3] Jantsch E. Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation. Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities. Available at: https://archive.org/details/ERIC_ED061895/page/n101 (accessed October 10, 2022).
[4] Knyazeva E.N. Transdistsiplinarnye strategii issledovaniy [Transdisciplinary research strategies]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta — Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2011, no. 10, pp. 193–201.
[5] Malkov S.M., Rozin V.M., Yaroslavtseva E.I. Transdistsiplinarnost v filosofii i nauke. Materialy kruglogo stola [Transdisciplinarity in the philosophy and in the science: A round-table]. Chelovek — Chelovek Journal, 2016, no. 6, pp. 33–44.
[6] Saltykov S.A., Novikov D.A., Rusyaeva E.Yu. Tipologiya mezhdistsiplinarnosti [The typology of interdisciplinarity]. Filosofiya nauki — Philosophy of Science, 2017, no. 3, pp. 3–16.
[7] Rednikina V.E. Transdistsiplinarnost kak vektor razvitiya sovremennykh biologicheskikh issledovaniy [Transdisciplinary as a vector of the development of modern biological research]. Vestnik TvGU. Seriya: Filosofiya — Vestnik of Tver State University. Series: Philosophy, 2021, no. 2, pp. 34–40.
[8] Slobodyan V.V. Sovremennaya nauka i metodologiya transdistsiplinarnosti v rasshirenii nauchnogo mirovozzreniya [Modern science and methodology of transdisciplinary in the expansion of scientific world view]. Nauchnyi zhurnal — Scientific Journal, 2019, no. 2, pp. 159–161.
[9] Mokiy V.S., Lukyanova T.A. Transdistsiplinarnost: stereotipy, podkhody i napravleniya [Transdisciplinarity: stereotypes, approaches and trends]. Universum: obschestvennye nauki — Universum: Social Sciences, 2021, no. 3, pp. 7–19.
[10] Husserl E. Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie (The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: an introduction to phenomenological philosophy) [In Russ.: Gusserl E. Krizis evropeyskikh nauk i transtsedentalnaya fenomenologiya. Novocherkassk, Saguna Publ., 1994, pp. 49–100].
[11] Florensky P.A. U vodorazdelov mysli. Sochineniya v 4 t. T. 3 [By the watersheds of thought. Works in 4 vol. Vol. 3]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 2000, 621 p.
[12] Frank S.L. Nepostizhimoe. Sochineniya [Incomprehensible. Works]. Moscow, Pravda Publ., 1990, pp. 181–479.
[13] Shustova O.B., Sidorov G.N. Traditsii ratsionalizma v preodolenii krizisa nauchnogo poznaniya [Traditions of rationality in overcoming the crisis of scientific cognition]. Omsk, OmGPU Publ., 2018, 152 p.
[14] Opolev P.V. Logicheskiy printsip prostoty v naukakh o slozhnosti [The logical principle of simplicity in sciences about simplicity]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta — Herald of Omsk University, 2014, no. 4, pp. 87–90.
[15] Feyerabend P. Izbrannye trudy po metodologii nauki [Selected works on methodology of science]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1986, pp. 467–523.
[16] Ivin A.A. Osnovy teorii argumentatsii [Basics of the argumentation theory]. Moscow, Vlados Publ., 1997, 352 p.