Distinctive features of the social organism: a socio-philosophical analysis
Authors: Komissarov I.I. | Published: 03.11.2022 |
Published in issue: #5(97)/2022 | |
DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2022-5-801 | |
Category: The Humanities in Technical University | Chapter: Philosophy Science | |
Keywords: social philosophy, society, sociological realism, social organism, external analogies, social development, morphology, social evolution, biological organism |
In the framework of social philosophy, the paper considers the use of biological external analogies in relation to society. The author departs from the abstract approach to society as a social organism in order to identify specific features of society as an organic whole in comparison with real life forms. An attempt is also made to concretize the analogy between society and a living being. The morphology, various manifestations of vital activity and forms of relations between social organisms are analyzed. As a result of the comparative analysis, it was found that society in the broadest sense in terms of morphology is similar to a developed animal-type organism. The presence of a special “social consciousness” leads to the idea that the social organism has a similarity with the human being. However, a more detailed examination reveals that the society is characterized by distinctive features that are either characteristic of other living beings or have no relation to living organisms at all. As a result, it is concluded that the social organism is better than biological in several features and in general and it presents the next stage of evolution of life on Earth.
References
[1] Hobbes T. Sochineniya [Essays]. In two volumes. Vol. 1. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1989, 622 p.
[2] Kochetova L.M. Kategoriya “obschestvenno-ekonomicheskaya formatsiya” v rabotakh Karla Marksa 40-kh i 50-kh godov XIX v. Sravnitelnyy analiz. Avtoreferat diss… kand. filos. nauk. [The category of “socio-economic formation” in the works of Karl Marx of the 40s and 50s of the XIX century. Comparative analysis. Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Sciences in Philosophy]. Leningrad, LGU, 1990, 24 p.
[3] Nekhamkin V.A. Problemy istoricheskogo poznaniya — Problems of historical knowledge, 2015, no. 1, pp. 150–170.
[4] Bransky V.P. Obschestvennyye nauki i sovremennost — Social sciences and contemporary world, 1999, no. 6, pp. 117–127.
[5] Spencer H. Opyty nauchnyye, politicheskiye i filosofskiye [Scientific, political and philosophical experiences]. Minsk, Sovremennyy literator Publ., 1999, 1408 p.
[6] Danilevsky N.Ya. Rossiya i Evropa [Russia and Europe]. Moscow, Institut russkoy tsivilizatsii; Blagosloveniye Publ., 2011, 816 p.
[7] Spengler O. Der Untergang des Abendlandes. Münch., 1918–1922 [In Russ.: Spengler O. Zakat Evropy. Ocherki morfologii mirovoy istorii. 1. Geshtalt i deystvitelnost. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1998, 663 p.].
[8] Fromm E. Zdorovoye obschestvo. Dogmat o Khriste [Sane society. The dogma of Christ]. Moscow, AST Publ.; Tranzitkniga Publ., 2005, 571 p.
[9] Tarde G. Sotsialnaya logika [Social logic]. Saint-Petersburg, Socialno-psikhologicheskyy tsentr, 1996, 556 p.
[10] Kautsky K. Agrarnyy vopros [The agrarian question]. Moscow, Librokom Publ., 2012, 352 p.
[11] Khvostov V.M. Teoriya istoricheskogo protsessa. Ocherki po filosofii i metodologii istorii [Theory of the historical process. Essays on philosophy and methodology of history]. Moscow, Moscow Scientific Publishing House named after G.M. Mark at the Moscow Scientific Institute, 1919, 390 p.
[12] Kanarsh G.Yu. Znaniye. Ponimaniye. Umeniye — Knowledge. Understanding. Skil, 2015, no. 2, pp. 50–60.
[13] Milovzorova M.N. Vestnik LGU im. A.S. Pushkina — Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal, 2016, no. 3, pp. 88–96.
[14] Semenov Yu.I. Filosofiya i obschestvo — Philosophy and Society, 2015, no. 3–4 (77), pp. 51–75.
[15] Skvorets V.A. Filosofiya i obschestvo — Philosophy and Society, 2013, no. 3 (71), pp. 87–104.
[16] Semenov Yu.I. Filosofiya istorii (Obschaya teoriya, osnovnyye problemy, idei i kontseptsii ot drevnosti do nashikh dney) [Philosophy of history (General theory, main problems, ideas and concepts from ancient times to the present day)]. Moscow, Sovremennyye tetradi Publ., 2003, 776 p.
[17] Lilienfeld-Toal P.F. Mysli o sotsialnoy nauke buduschego. Chelovecheskoye obschestvo kak realnyy organizm [Thoughts about the social science of the future. Human society as a real organism]. Moscow, Librokom Publ., 2012, 408 p.
[18] Khvostov V.M. Sotsiologiya: Istoricheskiy ocherk ucheniy ob obschestve [Sociology: A historical outline of the doctrines of society]. Moscow, Librokom Publ., 2011, 354 p.
[19] Shershenevich G.F. Obschaya teoriya prava [General theory of law]. Moscow, Br. Bashmakovykh Publ., 1910, 806 p.
[20] Kuzmina G.P. Filosofiya i obschestvo — Philosophy and Society, 2007, no. 1 (45), pp. 98–117.
[21] Komissarov I.I. Uchenyye zapiski Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnyye i sotsialnyye nauki — Scientific notes of the Orel State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2015, no. 6 (69), pp. 320–325.