Co-existence as a mechanism for implementing the compatibility of social existence: essence, levels, functions

The paper centers on the interpretation of compatibility of social existence as a fundamental community of co-subjects to consider co-existence as a community practice, which allows accumulating and developing the compatibility of existence in the structure of sociality. The study distinguishes the structural levels of co-existence and characterizes its specificity at the individual-personal (micro-level), structural-organizational (meso-level), and global (macro-level) levels. The following parameters were used to analyze each level: the host (subject), character, indicators of co-existence, functional role in society at this level. The study also outlines the mechanism of their relationship and emphasizes the functional role of each level of co-existence in the development of compatibility of social co-existence.

References
[1] Kurbanov M.G. Fenomen chelovechnosti [The phenomenon of humanity]. Makhachkala, ALEF Publ., 2016, 224 p.
[2] Nancy J.L. La communauté désoeuvrée. Christian Bourgois, 2011, 292 p. [In Russ.: Nancy J.L. Neproizvodimoe soobschestvo. Moscow, Vodoley Publ., 2011, 208 p.].
[3] Kimberg A.N. Sobytie i so-bytie: kak rabotaem s ponyatiyami? [Event and co-existence: how do we work with concepts?]. In: Lichnost i bytie: problemy, zakonomernosti i fenomenologiya so-bytiynosti. Materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (Krasnodar — Sochi, 27–29 sentiabria 2012 g.) [Personality and existence: problems, patterns and phenomenology of co-being. Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (Krasnodar — Sochi, September 27–29, 2012)]. Krasnodar, Kuban State University Publ., 2012, pp. 21–23.
[4] Donati P. Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Ser. I: Bogoslovie. Filosofiya. Religiovedenie — St. Tikhon’s University Review. Theology. Philosophy. Religious Studies . I Ser., 2018, no. 75. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zagadka-sotsialnogo-otnosheniya-prolegomeny-k-realisticheskoy-relyatsionnoy-sotsiologii (accessed March 10, 2021).
[5] Malkina S.M. Chelovecheskoe bytie kak bytie-sovmestnost [Human existence as existence-compatibility]. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/30126116/ (accessed April 30, 2021).
[6] Barulin V.S. Sotsialno-filosofskaya antropologiya. Obschie nachala sotsialno-filosofskoy antropologii [Socio-philosophical anthropology. General principles of socio-philosophical anthropology]. Moscow, Onega Publ., 1994, 256 p.
[7] Coleman J. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. Social Capital:A Multifaceted Perspective. Washington, The World Bank, 2000, 424 p.
[8] Dementev I.A. Vestnik Pomorskogo universiteta. Ser. Gumanitarnye i sotsialnye nauki — Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Ser. Humanitarian and Social Sciences, 2011, no. 1, pp. 40–45. Available at: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/doverie-kak-indikator-sotsialnogo-kapitala (accessed October 8, 2020).
[9] Pennings J.M., Lee K. Social Capital of Organization: Conceptualization, Level of Analysis, and Performance Implication. Corporate social capital and liability USA. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999, pp. 43–67.
[10] Manuylov Yu.S. Novye tsennosti obrazovaniya (New values of education), 2010, no. 1. Available at: http://www.ni-centr.ru/bez-rubriki/manujlov-yu-s-yazyk-so/ (accessed February 15, 2021).
[11] Spengler O. Der Untergang des Abendlandes. Albatros, 1st ed., 2007, 1280 p. [In Russ.: Spengler O. Zakat Evropy. V 2 t. T. 1. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1993, 663 p.].
[12] Slobodchikov V.I. Novye tsennosti obrazovaniya (New values of education), 2010, no. 1, pp. 4–14.
[13] Slobodchikov V.I. Antropologicheskaya perspektiva otechestvennogo obrazovaniya [Anthropological perspective of national education]. Ekaterinburg, Inform. and Publ. Dep. of Ekaterinburg Diocese Publ., 2009, 263 p.
[14] Vernadskiy V.I. Neskolko slov o noosfere [A few words about the noosphere]. Available at: http://vernadsky.lib.ru/e-texts/archive/noos.html (accessed February 8, 2021).
[15] Sorokin P.A. SOTsIS — Sociological Studies, 1992, no. 10, pp. 134–139.
[16] Kolin K.K. Strategicheskie prioritety (Strategic priorities), 2014, no. 1. Available at: https://www.elibrary/item.asp?id=23605234 (accessed February 8, 2021).
[17] Kolin K.K. Sotsialnaya stabilnost obschestva kak faktor natsionalnoy i globalnoy bezopasnosti [Social stability of society as a factor of national and global security]. Available at: http://sec.chgik.ru/1780-2/ (accessed February 8, 2021).
[18] Zverev M.K. Osobennosti sotsialnoy solidarnosti v sovremennom rossiyskom obschestve. Dis. … kand. filos. nauk [Features of social solidarity in modern Russian society. Cand. philos. sc. diss.]. Irkutsk, Irkutsk State University Publ., 2009, 162 p. Available at: https://www.dissercat.com/content/osobennosti-sotsialnoi-solidarnosti-v-sovremennom-rossiiskom-obshchestve/read (accessed February 8, 2021).
[19] Makin I.O. Kompromiss kak forma sotsialnogo vzaimodeistviya [Compromise as a form of social interaction]. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kompromiss-kak-forma-sotsialnogo-vzaimodeystviya (accessed February 13, 2021).
[20] Chernikova S.M. Sotsialny kompromiss v sisteme stabilizatsii obschestva. Dis. … kand. filos. nauk [Social compromise in the system of stabilizing society. Cand. philos. sc. diss.]. Volgograd, Volgograd State University Publ., 2003, 165 p. Available at: https://www.dissercat.com/content/sotsialnyi-kompromiss-v-sisteme-stabilizatsii-obshchestva (accessed February 8, 2021).
[21] Ashkerov A.Yu. Filosofskie problemy sovremennogo sotsialno-antropologicheskogo poznaniya. Avtoref. dis. … dok. filos. nauk [Philosophical problems of modern socio-anthropological knowledge. Dr. philos. sc. author’s abstract]. Moscow, MSU Publ., 2005, 38 p. Available at: https://search.rsl.ru/ ru/record/01003255506 (accessed February 6, 2021).
[22] Komissarov I.I., Nekhamkin V.A. Istoriya (The history), 2017, no. 2, p. 22.
[23] Nekhamkin V.A. Chelovek (The human), 2005, no. 6, pp. 56–61.