Resource as a category of philosophy of socialization

Authors: Scheglov I.A. Published: 12.05.2020
Published in issue: #2(82)/2020  
DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2020-2-652  
Category: The Humanities in Technical University | Chapter: Philosophy Science  
Keywords: resource, socialization, potential, individual’s resource, human resource, resource approach

The paper considers the problems of socialization actual for current scientific knowledge. The existing scientific meanings of the concept "social" are given. The author’s understanding of socialization resources and their classification are presented. The status of socialization resource as an independent scientific category and a sphere of scientific knowledge are revealed. The existing scientific interpretations of the key concepts discussed in the article are described. The content of the article is based on the author’s concept of individual’s socialization as a process of self-organization due to the social environment. The functions of the external environment are highlighted in accordance with the resource approach underlying the author’s concept of individual’s socialization. The advantage of the resource approach to socialization overcoming the limitations imposed on its study by the subject-object and subject-subject approaches traditional for pedagogical science is proved. Possible prospects for the development of a resource approach to socialization at the individual’s and society level are identified.

[1] Parsons T. The system of modern societies. USA, New Jersey, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall Publ., 1971 [In Russ.: Parsons T. Sistema sovremennykh obschestv. Moscow, Aspect Press Publ., 1998, 270 p.].
[2] Aaltola E. Environmental Ethics, 2008, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 175–193.
[3] Dubenuk N., ed. Bolshaya psikhologicheskaya entsiklopediya [Great psychological encyclopedia]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2007, 544 p.
[4] Shishkoff G., ed. Filosofskiy slovar: Osnovan G. Shmidtom [Philosophical dictionary: Founded by G. Schmidt]. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 2003, 575 p.
[5] Derkach A.A., Saiko E.V. Mir psikhologii (World of psychology), 2008, no. 4, pp. 225–238.
[6] Balatsky E.V. Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya — Monitoring of public opinion, 2007, no. 2, pp. 124–133.
[7] Gavrilenko L.S., Chupina V.B. “Zhiznennyy potentsial” i “zhiznennyy resurs”: teoreticheskiy analiz ponyatiy [“Life potential” and “life resource”: theoretical analysis of concepts]. Materialy III Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii “Psikhologicheskoe zdorovye cheloveka: zhiznennyy resurs i zhiznennyy potentsial” [Proceedings of the III International scientific and practical conference “Human psychological health: life resource and life potential”]. Krasnoyarsk, Verso Publ., 2016, pp. 99–105.
[8] Nekrasov A.S. Gumanitarnye vedomosti Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. L.N. Tolstogo (Humanitarian Gazette of Tula State Pedagogical University named after Lev Tolstoy), 2019, no. 3, pp. 149–157.
[9] Resursy esteticheskie [Aesthetic resources]. In: Ekologicheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar [Ecological encyclopedic dictionary]. Available at: http://www.cnshb.ru/AKDiL/0039/base/RR/000903.shtm (accessed February 25, 2020).
[10] Poltorak N.A. Trudy Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta putey soobscheniya (Proceedings of Rostov State Transport University), 2015, no. 1, pp. 140–146.
[11] Belyaev G.Yu. Sibirskiy pedagogicheskiy zhurnal — Siberian pedagogical journal, 2019, no. 6, pp. 7–21.
[12] Berdyaev N.A. Samopoznanie (Opyt filosofskoy avtobiografii) [Self-awareness (Experience in philosophical autobiography)]. Moscow, Kniga Publ., 1991, 448 p.