Jointness of social being as a category of social culture: comparative analysis of different positions

The paper presents the precise definition of the concept of jointness of being in a society on the basis of existing interpretations of jointness. The difference between such socio-philosophical categories as “be beside”, “be together” and “being jointly” is indicated. The role of community as a condition for the transformation of biological "being together" into a joint being is analyzed. The place and role of jointness in creating a new social axiological space are defined. Some prospects for the study of this concept in social culture are shown.

References
[1] Peccei A. The Human Quality. Oxford, New York, Pergamon Press Publ., 1977 [In Russ.: Peccei A. Chelovecheskie kachestva. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1985, 312 p.].
[2] Budanov V.G. Metodologiya proektirovaniya i prognozirovaniya v kontekste sinergetiki i teorii slozhnosti [Methodology of design and prediction in the context of synergetics and theory of complexity]. Available at: https://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/expertize/5990 (accessed February 08, 2020).
[3] Nekhamkin V.A. Sotsium i vlast - Society and Power, 2019, no. 2 (76), pp. 96−105.
[4] Gumplowicz L. Outlines of Sociology. New York, Paine-Whitman Publ., 1963, 336 p. [In Russ.: Gumplowicz L. Osnovy sotsiologii. Moscow, Lenand Publ., 2017, 366 p.].
[5] Hvostov V.M. Teoriya istoricheskogo processa. Ocherki po filosofii i metodologii istorii [Theory of the historical process. Essays on the philosophy and methodology of history]. Moscow, KomKniga Publ., 2006, 392 p.
[6] Bhaskar R. The Possibility of Naturalism. Ch. 2 Societies. New York, London, Harvester Wheatsheaf Publ., 1989, 44 p. [In Russ.: Vinokurova V.V., Filippova A.F., eds. Sociologos: sociologiya, antropologiya, metafizika. Vypusk 1. Obshchestvo i sfery smysla. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1991, pp. 219−240].
[7] Barulin V.S. Sotsialno-filosofskaya antropologiya. Obshchie nachala sotsialno-filosofskoy antropologii [Socio-philosophical anthropology. General principles of social and philosophical anthropology]. Moscow, Onega Publ., 1994, 256 p.
[8] Popper K. The Open Society and its enemies. Vol. 2. London, Routledge and Keagan Publ., 1962, 528 p.
[9] Husserl E. L’Origine de la Geometrie. Traduction et introduction par Jacques Derrida. Paris, Universitaires de France Publ., 1962, 222 p. [In Russ.: Husserl E. Nachalo geometrii. Moscow, Ad Marginem Publ., 1996, 268 p.].
[10] Husserl E. Izbrannye raboty [Selected works]. Moscow, Territoriya budushchego Publ., 2005, 464 p. [In Russ.]
[11] Heidegger M. Being and Time. London, SCM Press Publ., 1962 [In Russ.: Heidegger M. Vremya kartiny mira. Vremya i bytie. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1993, pp. 41−63].
[12] Heidegger M. Phenomenological interpretations with respect to Aristotle: Indication of the hermeneutical situation. Man and World, 1992, vol. 25, pp. 355–393 [In Russ.: Heidegger M. Fenomenologicheskie interpretatsii Aristotelya (Ekspozitsiya germenevticheskogo opyta). St. Petersburg, Gumanitarnaya akademiya Publ., 2012, 224 p.].
[13] Sartre J. Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. London, Routledge. Smith, W. R. and Torstensson Publ., 1997 [In Russ.: Sartre J. Bytie i nichto: Opyt fenomenologicheskoj ontologii. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 2000, 639 p.]
[14] Klimenko T.E. Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik - Omsk Scientific Bulletin, 2011, no. 5 (101), pp. 118−121. Available at: https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2011/5(101)_2011/1-4.pdf (accessed February 6, 2020).
[15] Sloterdajk P. Sphären I — Blasen, Mikrosphärologie. Suhrkamp Publ, 1998, 644 p. [In Russ.: Sloterdajk P. Sfery. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2005, 688 p.].
[16] Nancy J.-L. La Communauté désœuvrée. Paris, Christian Bourgois Publ., 1986 [In Russ.: Nancy J.-L. Neproizvodimoe soobshchestvo. Moscow, Vodoley Publ., 2011, 208 p.].
[17] Davydov O.B. Filosofiya soobshchestva R. Nisbeta [The philosophy of R. Nisbet’s community]. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/filosofiya-soobschestva-r-nisbeta (accessed February 2, 2020).
[18] Rousseau J.-J. Traktaty [Traités]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1969, 704 p. [In Russ.].
[19] Eremenko A.M. Sobytie i so-bytie v filosofii J.-L. Nancy [Event and co-existence in the philosophy of J.-L. Nancy]. Available at: http://bo0k.net/index.php?p=chapter&bid=2794&chapter=1 (accessed November 2, 2019).
[20] Kosilova E.V. Fenomenologicheskiy analiz diadicheskogo bytiya subyekta [Phenomenological analysis of the subject’s dyadic existence]. Available at: http://www.publishing-vak.ru/file/archive-philosophy-2016-2/8-kosilova.pdf (accessed May 08, 2019).
[21] Malkina S.M. Chelovecheskoe bytie kak bytie-sovmestnost [The human being as being-jointness]. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/30126116/CHelovecheskoe_bytie_kak_bytie-sovmestnost’ (accessed November 30, 2019).
[22] Azarenko S.A. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Seriya Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika — Izvestiya of Saratov University. Series: Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2016, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 412−417.
[23] Gert V.A. Tselostnost i subyektnost individualnogo bytiya cheloveka. Diss. dokt. filos. nauk. Avtoreferat [Integrity and subjectivity of the individual being of a person. Dr. phylos. sci. diss. Abstract]. Chelyabinsk, Chelyabinskiy gosudarstvennyy institute kultury Publ., 2016, 22 p.
[24] Latour B. British Journal of Sociology, 2000, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 107-123. Available at: http://philosophy1.narod.ru/www/html/library/latour/whenthings.html (accessed October 08, 2019).
[25] Momdzhyan K.Kh. Socialnaya filosofiya. Deyatelnostnyy podkhod k analizu cheloveka, obshchestva, istorii [Social philosophy. Activity-based approach to the analysis of a person, society, and history]. Part 1. Moscow, MGU Publ., 2013, 400 p.