Virtue and Prosperity: Hercules problem and the modern youthy

The article considers the problem of moral action and moral choice. The conclusion is that moral action is the result of the microshift in interaction of the inward man forces (mind, will and faith ) when thinking and decision making in favor of one or another system of symbolic representation of reality, where the forces of good and evil confront each other. The ethics of responsibility signifies a stage of state active participation in the prosperity and peaceful coexistence of people and nations. Thereby the problem of moral responsibility of the person is not eliminated of people and nations. And the problem of moral responsibility of the person is thereby solved.

References
[1] Plato. Dialogi [Dialogs]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1986, 607 p.
[2] Aristotle. Sochineniya v 4 tomakh. Tom 4 [Oeuvre in 4 volums. Vol. 4]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1983, 830 p.
[3] Filisofya nauki. Vyp. 1. Problemy ratsionalnosti [Philosophy of Science. Issue 1 Rationality Problems]. Moscow, Institute of Philosophy RAS Publ., 1995, 325 p.
[4] Spinoza B. Etika [Ethics]. St. Petersburg, Asta-Press Ltd Publ., 1993, 248 p.
[5] Delez Zh. Spinoza i problema vyrazheniya [Spinoza and the Problem of Expression]. Moscow, Institute of Humanities Research Publ., 2014, 320 p.
[6] Mill J.S. Utilitarianism. Crisp R., ed. Oxford University Press Publ., 1998. ISBN 0-19-875163-X. [In Russ.: Mill J.S. Utilitarizm. Rostov on Don, Don Publ., 2013, 240 p.].
[7] Yulina N.S. Dzhon Dyui [John Dewey]. In: Filisofy dvadtsatogo veka. Kn. 1 [The Philosophers of the Twentieth Century. Book 1]. Moscow, "Iskusstvo XXI vek" Publ., 2004, 367 p.
[8] Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Publ., 1971 [In Russ.: Rolz J. Teoriya spravedlivosti. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State University Publ., 1995, 532 p.].
[9] Dahrendorf R. Pfade aus Utopia. Zur Theorie und Methodologie der Soziologie. Munchen, 1967 [In Russ.: Darendorf R. Tropy iz utopii. Moscow, Praksis Publ., 2002, 656 p.].
[10] Nozik R. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford, 1993 [In Russ.: Nozik, R. Anarkhiya, gosudarstvo i utopiya. Moscow, IRISEN Publ., 2008, 424 p.].
[11] Semenova R.U. Vestnik Tumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta - Herald of Tumen State University, 2006, no. 2, pp. 51-55.
[12] Jonas H. Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik fur die technologische Zivilisation. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 1979, ISBN 3-518-37585-7 [In Russ.: Jonas G. Printsip otvetstvennosti: Opyt etiki dlya tekhnologicheskoy tsivilizatsii. Nauka kak personalnyy opyt. Moscow, Ayris-press Publ., 2004, 479 p.].
[13] Habermas, J. The Future of Human Nature. Cambrige, Polity Press, 2003 [In Russ.: Khabermas J. Budushchee chelovecheskoy prirody. Moscow, Ves mir Publ., 2002, 144 p.].
[14] Kung H. Dlya chego nuzhna etika? [What is the purpose of ethics?]. Sb. statey Otvetstvennost religii i nauki v sovremennom mire [Collection of scientific articles: The responsibility of religion and science in the modern world]. Moscow, Biblical Theological Institute of St. Andrew the Apostle Publ., 2007, 300 p.
[15] Ayer A. J. Language, Truth, and Logic, London, Gollancz. Publ., 1946. OCLC 416788667 [In Russ.: Ayer A.J. Yazyk, istina i logika. V kn.: Analytical philosophy: Selected texts. Moscow, MGU Publ., 1993, pp. 52-60].
[16] Kanke V.A. Etika otvetstvennosti. Teoriya morali budushchego [Ethics of Responsibility. The Theory of Morality of the Future]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2003, 292 p.
[17] Murdoch I. The Sovereignty of Good. London, Ark Publ., 1985. [In Russ.: Suverennost blaga. V kn. Butler-Bowdon T. 50 velikikh knig po filosofii - In: 50 Great Philosophers]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2014, 576 p.].
[18] Volchenko V.N. Miroponimanie i ekoetika 21 veka [World View and Ecoethics of the 21st Century]. Moscow, BMSTU Publ., 2001, 432 p.
[19] Khomskiy N. Pribyl na ludyakh [Profit on Humans]. Moscow, Praksis Publ., 2002, 256 p.
[20] Chakraborti O. Voprosy filosofii - Problems of philosophy, 2007, no. 2, pp. 20-34.
[21] Frankfurt H.G. On Bullshit. Princeton University Press Publ., 2005. [In Russ.: O brekhne. V kn:. Butler-Bowdon T. 50 velikikh knig po filosofii [In: 50 Great Philosophers]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2014, p. 206.].
[22] Lapin N.I. Voprosy filosofii - Problemsofphilosophy, 2015, no. 4, pp. 3-14.
[23] Starodubrovskaya I.V. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost - Social Sciences and Modernity, 2015, no. 6, pp. 84-96.
[24] Yulina N.S. Filisofskaya mysl v SShA. ХХ vek [Philosophical Views in the United States. ХХ century]. Moscow, Kanon Publ., 2010, 600 p.
[25] Apresyan R.G. Ideya morali i bazovye normativno-eticheskie programmy [The Idea of Morality and Basic Legal and Ethical Programs]. Moscow, 1995, 353 p.
[26] Nazaretyan A.P. Evolutsiya nenasiliya: istoricheskaya perspektiva [Evolution of non-violence: a historical retrospective]. In: Istoriya i matematika: analiz i modelirovanie sotsialno-istoricheskikh protsessov [History and mathematics : analysis and modeling of social and historical processes]. Moscow, KomKniga Publ., 2007, 360 p.
[27] Tkhagapsoev Kh.G. Voprosy filosofii - Problems of philosophy, 2004, no. 12, pp. 155-163.
[28] Solovyev A.I. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost - Social Sciences and Modernity, 2015, no. 4, pp. 83-96.
[29] Tambovtsev V.L. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost - Social Sciences and Modernity, 2015, no. 6, pp. 5-13.
[30] Petukhov V.V. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya - Sociological studies, 2015, no. 12, pp. 28-40.
[31] Adamyants T.Z. Chelovek - Human, 2014, no. 3, pp. 34-41.
[32] Cassirer E. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Vol. 3. The Phenomenology of Knowledge. New Haven, Yale University Press Publ., 1929 [In Russ.: Kassirer E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form. T. 3. Fenomenologiya poznaniya. Moscow, Akademicheskiy prospect Publ., 2011, 398 p.].
[33] Balatskiy E.V. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost - Social Sciences and Modernity, 2015, no. 6, pp. 116-130.