The Career of Dmytrashko Raicha in the Context of the Tensions between the Colonels and the Hetman’s Authority in the Zaporizhian Army in the 1660s–1680s
| Authors: Almazov A.S. | Published: 26.02.2026 |
| Published in issue: #1(117)/2026 | |
| DOI: | |
| Category: Noname | |
| Keywords: starshyna of the Cossack Hetmanate, hetman, Cossack colonel, patronage, informal networks | |
The activities of Dmytrashko Raicha as a colonel of the Pereyaslav Regiment and a prominent military officer in the Zaporizhian Host were examined. His marriage to the widow of V.N. Zolotarenko was noted to enable him to establish connections among the senior officers, which, in turn, allowed him to secure the position of a registered colonel. Precisely these connections were shown to enable D. Raicha to regain the Pereyaslav colonelcy just a few months after his removal by Hetman D.I. Mnohogreshny in 1671. Moreover, the same connections allowed the Pereyaslav colonel to participate in the struggle for the hetman’s office in the spring of 1672, albeit unsuccessfully. Moreover, the same resource enabled the Pereiaslav colonel to participate in the struggle for the hetmancy in the spring of 1672, although without successMoreover, the same source enabled the Pereiaslav regimental colonel to participate in the struggle for the hetman’s office in the spring of 1672, albeit unsuccessfully. Contrary to the prevailing view in historiography, according to which D. Raicha was involved in conspiracies against Hetman I. Samoilovych in 1676 and 1682, the study concludes that he was not guilty. The judicial proceedings of 1676–1677 and 1682–1683, which resulted from the hetman’s attempts to eliminate his political opponents, have been analyzed. It is shown that in both cases D. Raicha was spared the death penalty due to the support of the starshyna, and that his connections within the officer elite enabled him to take revenge on I. Samoilovych for earlier persecutions by participating in the 1687 conspiracy against the hetman, which ultimately led to his removal from power. It is also noted that participation in the conspiracy allowed D. Raicha to regain the position of Pereiaslav regimental colonel; however, during his subsequent confrontation with Hetman I.S. Mazepa, he soon lost his office. The examination of the biography of this long-serving Pereiaslav colonel helps to clarify the nature of relations between colonels and hetmans in the Cossack Hetmanate in the 1660s–1680s: despite a general trend toward strengthening hetman authority, the colonels retained a significant degree of political autonomy.
EDN TMZKKZ
References
[1] Storozhenko A. Rodion Grigorievich Dmytrashko, polkovnik pereyaslavskiy. Kievskaya starina, 1893, no. 4, pp. 1–28.
[2] Doroshenko D. Getman Petro Doroshenko: obzor ego zhizni i politicheskoy deyatelnosti [Hetman Petro Doroshenko: an Overview of his life and political activity]. New York, Ukrainskaya Vilnaya Akademiya Nauk v SShA, 1985, 712 p.
[3] Kostomarov N.I. Istoricheskie monografii i issledovaniya Nikolaya Kostomarova. Vol. 15: Ruina. Istoricheskaya monografiya. 1663–1687. Getmanstva Brukhovetskogo, Mnogogreshnogo i Samoylovicha [Historical monographs and studies by Nikolay Kostomarov. Vol. 15: The ruin. Historical monograph. 1663–1687. The hetmanships of Briukhovetsky, Most Sinful and Samoylovych]. Saint Petersburg, Tipografiya M.O. Volfa, 1882, 695 p.
[4] Florya B.N. “Delo Roslavtsa” i otnosheniya Moskvy i Baturina (1676–1677 gody) [“The Roslavets case” and relations between Moscow and Baturyn (1676–1677)]. Vostochnoslavyanskie issledovaniya, 2024, no. 3, pp. 11–35. https://doi.org/10.31168/2782-473X.2024.3.01
[5] Florya B.N. Rossiya i Levoberezhnoe getmanstvo v kontse 60-kh — nachale 70-kh godov XVII v. [Russia and the left-bank hetmanate in the late 1660s — early 1670s]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2024, 472 p.
[6] Krivosheya V.V., Krivosheya I.I., Krivosheya O.V. Neuryadova starshina Getmanschiny [Non-official starshyna of the hetmanate]. Kiev, Stilos Publ., 2009.
[7] Sokyrko O. Kozatskiy Mars: Derzhava ta viys’ko Kozats’kogo Het’manatu v dobu Militarnoy revolyutsii, 1648–1764 [Cossack Mars: the state and army of the Cossack Hetmanate in the age of the military revolution, 1648–1764]. Kiev, Tempora Publ., 2023, 912 p.
[8] Modzalevskiy V.L. Malorossiiskiy rodoslovnik. Vol. 1: A–D [Little Russian genealogical register. Vol. 1: A–D]. Kiev, Tipografiya Tovarischestva G.L. Frontskevicha i K., 1908, 519 p.
[9] Gorobets V.M. Polkovnik Viyska Zaporozkogo ta yogo vlada [The colonel of the Zaporizhian host and his authority]. Ukrainskiy istorychnyy zhurnal, 2014, no. 4, pp. 50–70.
[10] Babulin I.B. Voyna za vozvraschenie Ukrainy 1668–1669 gg. [The war for the return of Ukraine, 1668–1669]. Moscow, Fond “Russkie vityazi” Publ., 2021, 225 p.
[11] Florya B.N. Vneshnepoliticheskaya programma A.L. Ordina-Naschokina i popytki ee osuschestvleniya [The foreign policy program of A.L. Ordin-Nashchokin and attempts at its implementation]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2013, 448 p.
[12] Akty, otnosyaschiesya k istorii Yuzhnoy i Zapadnoy Rossii, sobrannye i izdannye Arkheograficheskoyu komissieyu (AYuZR). Vol. VII: 1657–1663, 1668–1669 [Acts relating to the history of Southern and Western Russia, collected and published by the archaeographic commission]. Saint Petersburg, Tipografiya V.V. Prattsa, 1872, no. 45.
[13] Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy arkhiv drevnikh aktov (RGADA) [Russian state archive of ancient acts]. F. 210, op. 13, ed. khr. 536.
[14] Florya B.N. Getman i starshina v Levoberezhnom getmanstve v gody pravleniya Dem’yana Mnogogreshnogo (1669–1672) [The hetman and the starshyna in the left-bank hetmanate during the rule of Demyan Mnogogreshny (1669–1672)]. Slavyanovedenie, 2021, no. 4, pp. 5–11.
[15] Akty, otnosyashchiesya k istorii Yuzhnoi i Zapadnoi Rossii (AYuZR). Vol. IX: 1668–1672 [Acts relating to the history of Southern and Western Russia]. Saint Petersburg, Tipografiya M. Ettingera, 1877, no. 146, 147, 178.
[16] Sobranie gosudarstvennykh gramot i dogovorov, khranyaschikhsya v gosudarstvennoy kollegii inostrannykh del. Part 4 [Collection of state charters and treaties preserved in the state collegium of foreign affairs]. Saint Petersburg, Tipografiya S. Selivanovskogo, 1826, no. 78.
[17] Almazov A.S. Borba za getmanstvo v voyske zaporozhskom v 1672 godu i pozitsiya Moskvy [The struggle for the hetmancy in the zaporizhian host in 1672 and the position of Moscow]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Obschestvennye nauki — Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 2023, no. 4 (853), pp. 59–60.
[18] Akty, otnosyashchiesya k istorii Yuzhnoy i Zapadnoy Rossii (AYuZR). Vol. XI: 1672–1674. Pribavleniya 1657 [Acts relating to the history of Southern and Western Russia. Addenda 1657]. Saint Petersburg, Tipografiya M. Ettingera, 1879, no. 34, 107.
[19] RGADA [Russian state archive of ancient acts]. F. 229, op. 1, ed. khr. 95.
[20] Almazov A.S. Politicheskiy portret ukrainskogo getmana Ivana Samoylovicha v kontekste russko-ukrainskikh otnosheniy (1672–1687 gg.) [The political portrait of the Ukrainian hetman Ivan Samoilovych in the context of Russo-Ukrainian relations (1672–1687)]. Moscow, s.n., 2012, 288 p.
[21] Eyngorn V. O snosheniyakh malorossiiskogo dukhovenstva s moskovskim pravitelstvom v tsarstvovanie Alekseya Mikhaylovicha [On the relations of the little Russian clergy with the Moscow government during the reign of Alexei Mikhailovich]. Moscow, Universitetskaya tipografiya, 1890, XIV, 1104 p.
[22] RGADA [Russian state archive of ancient acts]. F. 124, op. 1, 1674, ed. khr. 38.
[23] Akty, otnosyaschiesya k istorii yuzhnoy i zapadnoy Rossii (AYuZR). Vol. XII: 1675–1676 [Acts relating to the history of southern and western Russia]. Saint Petersburg, Tipografiya bratiev Panteleevykh, 1882, no. 200.
[24] Akty, otnosyaschiesya k istorii Yuzhnoy i Zapadno Rossii (AYuZR). Vol. XIII: 1677–1678 [Acts relating to the history of Southern and Western Russia]. Saint Petersburg, Tipografiya A.M. Kotomina i K., 1884, no. 2, 15, 101.
[25] Motyzhinskiy arkhiv. Akty Pereyaslavskogo polka XVII–XVIII vv. [Motyzhyn archive. Acts of the Pereiaslav Regiment of the 17th–18th centuries]. Kiev, Andrey i Aleksandr Savitskie, 1890, no. 65, 67, 69.
[26] RGADA [Russian state archive of ancient acts]. F. 124, op. 1, 1677, ed. khr. 5.
[27] Bogatyrev A.V. Neizdannyy dokument o zagovore protiv getmana I.S. Samoylovicha [An unpublished document on the conspiracy against hetman I.S. Samoylovych]. In: Problemy istorii i arkheologii Ukrainy: Materialy X Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii, posvyaschennoy 125-letiyu professora K.E. Grinevicha (Khar’kov, 4–5 noyabrya 2016 g.) [Problems of history and archeology of Ukraine: Proceedings of the 10th international scientific conference dedicated to the 125th anniversary of Professor K.E. Grinevich (Kharkov, November 4–5, 2016)]. Kharkov, NTMТ Publ., 2016, pp. 45–46.
[28] RGADA [Russian state archive of ancient acts]. F. 79, op. 1 (knigi), ed. khr. 182.
[29] RGADA [Russian state archive of ancient acts]. F. 229, op. 2, ed. khr. 125.
[30] Chukhlib T.V. Getmany Pravoberezhnoy Ukrainy v istorii Tsentralno-Skhidnoy Evropy (1663–1713) [Hetmans of right-bank Ukraine in the history of Central and Eastern Europe (1663–1713)]. Kiev, Vidavnichiy dim “Kyievo-Mogilyanska akademiya” Publ., 2004, 288 p.
[31] RGADA [Russian state archive of ancient acts]. F. 229, op. 1, ed. khr. 154, ch. 1.
[32] RGADA [Russian state archive of ancient acts]. F. 124, op. 5, ed. khr. 10.
[33] Kochegarov K.A. Rech Pospolitaya i Rossiya v 1680–1686 godakh. Zaklyuchenie dogovora o Vechnom mire [The Polish–Lithuanian ommonwealth and Russia in 1680–1686. The Conclusion of the Treaty of Eternal Peace]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2008, 504 p.
[34] Yakovleva T.G. Donos starshiny na I. Samoylovicha: analiz pervoistochnika [Denunciation of the starshyna against I. Samoylovich: analysis of a primary source]. Ukrainskiy istorichniy zhurnal, 2006, no. 4, pp. 190–200.
[35] Gordon P. Dnevnik, 1684–1689 [Diary, 1684–1689]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2009, 336 p.
[36] Simonovskiy P.I. Kratkoe opisanie o kozatskom malorossiyskom narode i o voennykh ego delakh, sobrannoe iz raznykh istoriy inostrannykh, nemetskoy — Bishenga, latinskoy — Bezoldi, frantsuzskoy — Shevalie i rukopisey russkikh, cherez bunchukovogo tovarischa Petra Simonovskogo 1765 goda [A short description of the cossack little Russian people and their military affairs, compiled from various foreign histories: German by Bisching, Latin by Bezold, French by Chevalier, and Russian manuscripts, by bunchuk comrade Petr Simonovskiy, 1765]. Moscow, Imperatorskoe obschestvo istorii i drevnostey rossiyskikh, 1847, 160, 18 p.
[37] Velichko S. Litopis [Chronicle]. Kiev, Klio Publ., 2020, LXXXIV, 931 p.
[38] Listi Ivana Mazepi. T. 1: 1687–1691 [Letters of Ivan Mazepa. Vol. 1: 1687–1691]. Kiev, Institute of History of Ukraine, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2002, no. 54, 62, 92.
[39] Ogloblin O. Getman Ivan Mazepa Hetman Ivan Mazepa ta yoho doba [Hetman Ivan Mazepa and His Era]. New York; Paris; Toronto, OOChSU Publ., 1960, 408 p.
[40] Kochegarov K.A. Russkoe pravitelstvo i pravo getmana I.S. Mazepy naznachat kazatskikh polkovnikov Vojska Zaporozhskogo: kazus Ivana Chernisha 1707 goda. Slavyanovedenie, 2016, no. 2, pp. 29–40.
[41] Gorobets V. Polkovniki Voiska Zaporozhskogo: pravo volnoy eletsii v svete kazatskikh traditsiy, rasporyaditelnykh pripisov i politicheskikh realiy. In: Smoliy V.A., ed. Ukrainskiy Getmanat: ocherki istorii natsionalnogo gosudarstvoobrazovaniya XVII–XVIII vv.: v 2 kn. Kn. 1. Kiev, 2018, pp. 123–160.
