Innovation in development strategies: formation of a new field of science

The paper looks into the process offormation of a new field of social science, innovation science. The authors are interested in objectives and the outlook of the new science, they are inspired by considerable hopefully positive impact it may have on the development of civilisation and exciting opportunities of further comprehensive research of innovation activity such impact necessitates, and especially by exploring its challenges. The article provides thorough investigation into modern approaches to the study of innovation, giving a particular attention to socio-philosophical one. The authors have tried and proved the need of further in-depth study of the field in order to reveal the way intrinsic factors underlying civilisation development correlate with each other.

References
[1] Leont’ev D.A. Sovremennaya psikhologiya motivatsii [Modern psychology of motivation]. Moscow, Smy’sl Publ., 2002, 297 p.
[2] Lapin N.I. Teoriya i praktika innovatiki [Theory and Practice of Innovation]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2008, 328 p.
[3] Bagdasaryan N.G. Kulturologiya v sisteme sovremennogo znaniya. [Cultural Studies in the modern knowledge]. In: Kulturologiya [Cultural Studies]. Moscow, Yurait Publ., 2014, pp. 23-59.
[4] Yagolkovskiy S.R. Psihologiya innovacii: podkhody, modeli, processy. [Psychology of innovation: approaches, models, processes]. Moscow, The Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2011, 240 p.
[5] Drucker P.F. Biznes i innovacii. [Innovation and Entrepreneurship]. Moscow, Williams Publ., 2007, 432 p.
[6] Bagdasaryan N.G. K voprosu o kharaktere nauki: ne differentsirovat’, a integrirovat’ [On the issue of the nature of science: not differentiating but integrating]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 2014, no. 2, pp. 44-49.
[7] Mirskij E.M. Mezhdisciplinarnye issledovaniya [Interdisciplinary Studies]. Styopin V.S., red. Novaya filosofskaya enciklopediya [New Encyclopedia of Philosophy]. Vol. 4. Dictionary. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 2010, 736 p.
[8] Pohl C., Hadorn G.H. Principles for designing transdisciplinary research. Munich, Oekom, 2007, 169 p.
[9] El’kina E.E. Metodologicheskie problemy innovacionnoy deyatelnosti [Methodological problems of innovation activity]. Bibliosfera. - Bibliosphere, 2008, no. 4, pp. 10-14.
[10] Starostin A.M. Filosofskie innovacii v kognitivnom i prakseologicheskom kontekste [Philosophical innovations in cognitive and praxeological context]. Moscow, Librocom Publ., 2013, 368 p.
[11] Agranovich V.B. Soderzhanie ponyatiya "innovatsiya" kak social’no-filosofskoy kategorii [The concept of "innovation" as a socio-philosophical category]. Izvestiya Tomskogo politehnicheskogo universiteta. - The Bulletin of Tomsk Polytechnic University, 2008, no. 6, pp. 111-113.
[12] Fagerberg J. Innovation studies - The emerging structure of a new scientific field Research Policy, 2009, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 218-233.
[13] Schumpeter J.A. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. Kapitalizm, socializm i demokratiya [Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy]. Moscow, EKSMO Publ., 2007, 864 p.
[14] Nelson R. Evolyutsionnaya teoriya ekonomicheskikh izmeneniy [An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change]. Moscow, Business Publ., 2002, 536 p.
[15] Gohberg L.M. Innovacii v rossiyskoy ekonomike. Stagnatsiya v preddverii krizisa? [Innovation in the Russian economy. Stagnation in the run-up to the crisis?] Forsayt. - Forsight, 2009, no. 2, pp. 28-46.
[16] Bagdasaryan N.G., Korol’ M.P. Nauchnaya kommunikatsiya v informatsionnom landshafte sovremennoy Rossii. [Scientific communication in the information landscape of modern Russia]. Uchenyi sovet - The Scientific Council, 2013, no. 7, pp. 18-22.