Classical, nonclassical and postnonclassical methodologies of science
Authors: Lebedev S.A. | Published: 26.02.2019 |
Published in issue: #2(76)/2019 | |
DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2019-2-596 | |
Category: The Humanities in Technical University | Chapter: Philosophy Science | |
Keywords: science methodology, scientific method, structure of scientific knowledge, scientific pluralism, scientific true, criteria of scientific truth |
The purpose of the paper was to study the issue of reconstructing the conceptual core of three different periods in the development of science methodology: classical, nonclassical and postnonclassical. The paper describes the scientific and philosophical underpinnings of these types of science methodology, their relationship with the change of the periods
References
[1] Lebedev S.A. Filosofiya nauchnogo poznaniya. Osnovnye kontseptsii [Philosophy of scientific knowledge. Basic concepts]. Moscow, MPSU Publ., 2014, 272 p.
[2] Lebedev S.A. Nauchny metod: istoriya i teoriya [The scientific method: history and theory]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2018, 448 p.
[3] Lebedev S.A. Novoe v psihologo-pedagogicheskikh issledovaniyah — Innovation in Psychological and Pedagogical Research, 2013, no. 3, pp. 7–18.
[4] Lebedev S.A. Kurs lektsiy po filosofii nauki [Course of lectures on the philosophy of science]. Moscow, BMSTU Publ., 2014, 318 p.
[5] Stepin V.S. Istoriya i filosofiya nauki [History and philosophy of science]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt Publ., 2009, 423 p.
[6] Lebedev S.A. Filosofskie nauki — Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 2013, no. 4, pp. 69–83.
[7] Lebedev S.A. Osnovy filosofii nauki [Fundamentals of philosophy of science]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt Publ., 2005.
[8] Lebedev S.A. Voprosy filosofii — Russian Studies in Philosophy, 2015, no. 6, pp. 53–64.
[9] Rickert H. Kulturwissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft. Freiburg, Leipzig und Tübingen, 1899, 76 p. [In Russ.: Rickert H. Nauki o prirode i nauki o kulture. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1988, 413 p.].
[10] Lebedev S.A. Gumanitarny vestnik — Humanities Bulletin of BMSTU, 2018, no. 4. DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2018-4-514
[11] Popper K.R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London, 1959, 302 p. [In Russ.: Popper K.R. Logika i rost nauchnogo znaniya. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1983].
[12] Lebedev S.A. Izvestiya RAO — Izvestia of the Russian Academy of Education, 2018, no. 2, pp. 5–17.
[13] Lebedev S.A. Voprosy filosofii — Russian Studies in Philosophy, 2017, no. 5, pp. 66–79.
[14] Lebedev S.A. Istoriya i filosofiya nauki [History and philosophy of science]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2018, 688 p.
[15] Baudrillard J. Les stratégies fatales. Grasset, 2014, 288 p. [In Russ.: Baudrillard J. Fatalnye strategii. Moscow, RIPOL klassik Publ., 2017, 288 p.].
[16] Derrida J. L’écriture et la différence. Éditions du Seuil, Paris, 1967, 437 p. [In Russ.: Derrida J. Pismo i razlichie. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt Publ., 2000, 495 p.].
[17] Kuhn T.S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, 1962, 222 p. [In Russ.: Kuhn T.S. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy. Moscow, AST Moskva Publ., 1974, 311 p.].
[18] Mulkay M.J. Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. HarperCollins Publishers Ltd, 1979, 144 p. [In Russ.: Mulkay M.J. Nauka i sotsiologiya znaniya. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1985, 273 p.].
[19] Hübner K. Kritik der wissenschaftlichen Vernunft. Verlag Karl Alber, 2002, 448 p. [In Russ.: Hübner K. Kritika nauchnogo razuma. Moscow, IFRAN Publ., 1994, 326 p.].
[20] Lebedev S.A., Koskov S.N. Novoe v psihologo-pedagogicheskikh issledovaniyah — Innovation in Psychological and Pedagogical Research, 2014, no. 1, pp. 7–13.