The study of risks determination and mental responses to their occurrence
Authors: Gubanov N.N., Gubanov N.I., Volkov A.E. | Published: 20.12.2017 |
Published in issue: #12(62)/2017 | |
DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2017-12-498 | |
Category: The Humanities in Technical University | Chapter: Philosophy Science | |
Keywords: risk appetite, search for strong sensation, life expectancy, setting for rapid obtaining success, low self-control, socio-ethical review, bioethics, responsibility imperative, ecological imperative, riskology |
The article emphasizes and characterizes the following internal determinants of risk behavior: risk appetite, search for strong sensation, life expectancy, setting for rapid obtaining success, low self-control, and courage. We show differences of age regarding appetite for risk. Norms and expectations formed by the family, social groups and culture type are ascribed to the external determinants of risk behavior. As the mental responses to the occurrence of risks connected with the scientific and technological progress we highlight a socio-ethical review of the scientific programs and projects, an emergence of bioethics, a principle of the informed consent to the investigation, a responsibility imperative, an ecological imperative, and a formation of riskology and globalist’s mentality.
References
[1] Gubanov N.N., Gubanov N.I., Cheremnykh L.G. Gumanitarnyy vestnik - Humanities Bulletin, 2017, no. 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.18698/2306-8477-2017-11-483
[2] Shaboltas A.V. Riskovannoe povedenie [Risk behavior]. Psikhologiya [Psychology]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2009, pp. 502-505.
[3] Efimovskikh V.S. Riski v sovremennom obshchestve: sotsialno-filosofskiy analiz. Diss. kand. filos. nauk [Risks in the contemporary society: socio-philosophical analysis. Cand. philos. sc. diss.]. Ufa, 2009, 156 p.
[4] Kon I. Malchik - otets muzhchiny [Boy is man’s father]. Moscow, Vremya Publ., 2009, 704 p.
[5] Yanykhbash A.V. Vzaimosvyaz riskovannogo povedeniya s psikhologicheskimi kharakteristikami lichnosti. Avtoref. dis. kand. psikhol. nauk [Interrelation between risk behavior and personal psychological characteristics. Cand. psych. sc. diss. author’s abstract]. Moscow, 2013, 24 p.
[6] Blackburn R. The Psychology of Criminal Conduct: Theory, Research and Practice. Wiley Series in Clinical psychology, 1998, 514 p. [In Russ.: Blackburn R. Psikhologiya kriminalnogo povedeniya. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2004, 496 p.].
[7] Tsaregorodtsev G.I., Shingarov G.Kh., Gubanov N.I. Istoriya i filosofiya nauki [History and philosophy of science]. Moscow, SGU Publ., 2014, 461 p.
[8] Shaboltas A.V. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta Ser. 12. Sotsiologiya - Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 2014, no. 3, pp. 5-16.
[9] Stoner J. Risky and cautious shifts and group decisions. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 1968, vol. 4, pp. 442-459.
[10] Tischenko P.D. Filosofskie nauki - Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 2010, no. 12, pp. 42-49.
[11] Beck U. Risikogesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1986. [In Russ.: Beck U. Obshchestvo riska: Na puti k drugomu modernu (Risk society: on the way toward other modern). Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2000, 383 p.].
[12] Yanitskiy O.N. Riskologiya kak nauka [Riskology as a science]. Available at: http://moyuniver.net/1990-e-gg-riskologiya-kak-nauka-yanickij-o-n/ (accessed August 23, 2017).
[13] Buyanov V.P., Kirsanov K.A., Mikhaylov L.M. Riskologiya (upravlenie riskami) [Riskology (risk management)]. Moscow, Ekzamen Publ., 2003, 384 p.
[14] Lebedev S.A. Voprosy filosofii - Russian Studies in Philosophy, 2017, no. 5, pp. 66-79.
[15] Schweitzer A. Kultur und Ethik. Munchen, 1960 [In Russ.: Schweitzer A. Kultura i etika (Culture and ethics). Moscow, Progress Publ., 1973, 343 p.]
[16] Potter V.R. Bioetika. Most v budushchee [Bioethics. A bridge to the future]. Kiev, the Ukraine Association on Bioethics Publ., 2002, 384 p.
[17] Khrustalev Yu.M. Vestnik Rossiyskogo filosofskogo obshchestva (Bulletin of the Russian philosophic society), 2009, no. 2, pp. 173-178.
[18] Jonas H. The imperative of responsibility: in search of an ethics for technological age. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2008, 263 р.
[19] Yudin B.G. Filosofskie nauki - Russian Studies in Philosophy, 2010, no. 12, pp. 58-66.
[20] Moiseev N.N. Voprosy filosofii - Russian Studies in Philosophy, 1995, no. 1, pp. 3-30.
[21] Bekhmann G., Gorokhov V.G. Voprosy filosofii - Russian Studies in Philosophy, 2012, no. 7, pp. 120-132.
[22] Luhmann N. Der Begriff Risiko. In: N.Luhmann. Soziologie des Risikos. Berlin; New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1991, pp. 9-40. [In Russ.: Luman N. Ponyatie riska [The notion of risk (1991)]. THESIS, 1994, no. 5, pp. 135-160.].
[23] Gubanov N.I., Gubanov N.N. Istoricheskaya psikhologiya i sotsiologiya istorii - Historical Psychology & Sociology, 2013, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 166-180.
[24] Vernadskiy V.I. Razmyshleniya naturalista. Kn. 2 [Thoughts of a natural scientist. Book 2]. Moscow, the USSR Academy of Sciences Publ., 1977, 192 p.
[25] Gubanov N.I., Gubanov N.N. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya - Sociological Studies, 2011, no. 4, pp. 51-58.
[26] Selivanov F.A. Sfera gluposti (atasfera). [Sphere of nonsense]. Bytie i my [Existence and us]. Tyumen, Vektor Buk Publ., 2011, pp. 87-90.
[27] Berelekhis A.A., Ilinskaya S.G. Filosofskie nauki - Russian Studies in Philosophy, 2007, no. 3, pp. 111-129.
[28] Goliney V.A. Vestnik Rossiyskogo filosofskogo obshchestva (Bulletin of the Russian philosophic society), 2015, no. 4, pp. 82-85.
[29] Demenchonok E.V. Vestnik Rossiyskogo filosofskogo obshchestva (Bulletin of the Russian philosophic society), 2015, no. 4, pp. 91-96.
[30] Gubanov N.I., Gubanov N.N. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshey shkoly)(Alma mater (High school bulletin)), 2014, no. 11, pp. 11-17.