Philosophy of the Russian Mach culture: P. Yushkevich’s empiriosymbolism and P.K. Engelmeyer’s evrology
Authors: Chernysheva A.V. | Published: 19.05.2014 |
Published in issue: #2(16)/2014 | |
DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2014-2-172 | |
Category: The Humanities in Technical University | Chapter: Philosophy Science | |
Keywords: empiriosymbolism, symbolization, reality, cultural creativity, evrology, activism |
The article presents a comparative analysis of P. Yushkevich's empiriosymbolism and P.K. Engelmeyer's evrology. The main attention is paid to considering culture as a person's creative activity. The study examines originality and distinctive features of these concepts.
References
[1] Gorokhov V.G. Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniya i tekhniki - Issues of History of Science and Technology, 1990, no. 4, pp. 41-60.
[2] Kurochkina L.Ya. Chelovek i tvorchestvo v russkoi kul'ture nachala XX veka (P. Engel'meier) [Man and creativity in Russian culture of the early twentieth century (P. Engelmeyer)]. Chelovek. Ekonomicheskie i dukhovnye tsennosti obshchestva [Man. Economic and spiritual values of society]. Col. sci. works. Voronezh, 1991, pp. 53-61.
[3] Mamardashvili M.K., Pyatigorskiy A.M. Simvol i soznanie. Metafizicheskie rassuzhdeniya o soznanii, simvolike i yazyke [Symbol and consciousness. Metaphysical reasoning about consciousness, symbolism and language]. Moscow, 2009.
[4] Nikitina N. N. Filosofiya kul’tury russkogo pozitivizma nachala veka [Culture philosophy of Russian positivism in the beginning of the century]. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ., 1996.
[5] Petrovich G.P. Filosofiya tekhniki i tvorchestva P.K. Engel’meiera: Istoriko-filosofskiy analiz [Philosophy of P.K. Engelmeyer's technology and creativity. Historico-philosophical analysis: Ph.D. dissertation in Philosophy]. Dis. kand. filos. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2002.
[6] Steil D. Nauka i revolyutsiya: Retsenziia empiriokrititsizma v russkoi kul’ture (1877-1910) [Science and Revolution: Empiriocriticism in Russian culture (1877-1910)]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt Publ., 2013.
[7] Khesse K. Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniya i tekhniki - Issues of History of Science and Technology, 1990, no. 4, pp. 60-70.
[8] Chernysheva A.V. Obshchestvennye nauki - Social studies, 2012, no. 3, pp. 127-137.
[9] Chernysheva A.V. Stanovlenie filosofii kul’tury v Rossii. Ot Chaadaeva do nashikh dnei [Philosophy of culture formation in Russia. From Chaadaev to our days]. Saabruecken, Germany: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing GmbH, 2011.
[10] Chernysheva A.V. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki - Historical, philosophical, political, legal and cultural studies and art history. Theory and Practice, 2013, no.5, p. 2, pp. 205-207.
[11] Engel'meier P.K. Voprosy teorii i psikhologii tvorchestva - Issues of theory and psychology of creativity, vol. V, Khar'kov, "Mirnyi trud" Publ., 1914.
[12] Engel'meier P.K. Voprosy teorii i psikhologii tvorchestva - Issues of theory and psychology of creativity, vol . VII, Khar'kov, "Mirnyi trud" Publ., 1916.
[13] Yushkevich P.S. Sovremennyi mir - The modern world, 1907, April, St. Petersbutg, 1907.
[14] Yushkevich P.S. Sovremennaya energetika s tochki zreniya empiriosimvolizma [Modern energy in terms of empiriosymbolism]. Ocherki po filosofii marksizma [Essays on the Philosophy of Marxism]. St. Petersbutg, V. Bezobrazov & Co. Publ., 1908.