Socio-philosophical aspect of postmodernism and scientific eclectics

The paper considers the origins of metamodernism. The idea is substantiated that postmodernism is not only generated by hermeneutics of the XX century, but is itself one of the options and a branch in the hermeneutic game with meanings. The following hermeneutics features are distinguished: dialogism, mythology and intuitivism. Deep origins are emphasized in considering the world as the unique large text by the philosophers, who are supporting the Eleatic principle of the thinking and being identities. Meaningful connection between the modern evolutionary concept in science and such a capacious concept in metamodernism as the rhizome is revealed. The paper shows that science today is a special kind of sociality in the form of a unique large text with interweaving meanings and intersection of various problems being isomorphically constructed on the boundaries of the closely related areas of knowledge. A conclusion is made on the scientific eclecticism productivity in science development as a whole despite the ambiguity and risks of the postmodern tendencies present in it.

EDN URQAPC

References
[1] Kavinova I.P. Kartina mira: filosofskiy analiz problemy [Worldview: Philosophical analysis of the problem]. Gumanitarnyi vestnik — Humanities Bulletin of BMSTU, 2014, no. 12. https://doi.org/10.18698/2306-8477-2014-12-208
[2] Husserl E. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1954 [In Russ.: Gusserl E. Krizis evropeyskikh nauk i transtsedentalnaya fenomenologiya. St. Petersburg, Vladimir Dal Publ., 2022, 399 p.].
[3] James W. A Pluralistic Universe. 1909 [In Russ.: Dzhems U. Vselennaya s plyuralisticheskoy tochki zreniya. Moscow, Kosmos Publ., 1911, 543 p.].
[4] Gadamer H.G. Truth and Method. Seabury Press, 1975 [In Russ.: Gadamer G.G. Istina i metod. Osnovy filosofskoy germenevtiki. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1988, 704 p.].
[5] Betti E. Die Hermeneutik als allgemeine Methodik der Geisteswissenschaften. J.C.B. Mohr, 1962 [In Russ.: Betti E. Germenevtika kak obshchaya metodologiya nauk o dukhe. Moscow, Kanon Publ., 2011, 144 p.].
[6] Lotman Yu.M. Kultura i vzryv [Culture and explosion]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ., 1992, 273 p.
[7] Ricoeur P. Germenevtika. Etika. Politika [Hermeneutics. Ethics. Politics]. Moscow, Academia Publ., 1995, p. 18.
[8] Shklovsky V. O teorii prozy [On the theory of prose]. Moscow, Sovetskiy Pisatel Publ., 1983, pp. 127–130.
[9] Barthes R. S/Z. Aux Editions du Seuil, 1970 [In Russ.: Bart R. S/Z. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2001, 196 p.].
[10] Medawar P., Medawar J. The Life Science. Harper Collins Publishers, 1977 [In Russ.: Medavar P., Medavar Dzh. Nauka o zhivom. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1983, p. 18].
[11] Teilhard de Chardin P. Le phénomène humain. Éditions du Seuil, 1955 [In Russ.: Teyar de Sharden P. Fenomen cheloveka. Moscow, AST Publ., 2002, 554 p.].
[12] Fatenkov A.N. Kontseptsii podvizhno-ierarkhicheskoy prichinnosti (na puti preodoleniya mekhanicheskoy kauzalnosti) [Concepts of mobile-hierarchical causation (towards overcoming mechanical causation)]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta — Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University, 2005, Ser. 6, iss. 2, pp.1–6.
[13] Frank S.L. Ocherk metodologii obshchestvennykh nauk [Essay on methodology of the social sciences]. Moscow, Bereg Publ., 1922, p. 40.
[14] Deleuze G., Guattari F. A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1987 [In Russ.: Delez Zh., Gvattari F. Tysyacha plato. Kapitalizm i shizofreniya. Ekaterinburg, U.-Faktoriya Publ.; Moscow, Astrel Publ., 2010, p. 6].
[15] Prigozhin I., Haken G., Ebeling V. Sinergetika. Antologiya [Synergetic. Anthology]. Moscow, Tsentr Gumanitarnykh Initsiativ Publ., 2013, 408 p.
[16] Leskov L.V. Neizvestnaya Vselennaya [Unknown Universe]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2007, 425 p.
[17] Eco U. Postille a Il Nome della Rosa. Bompiani, 1982 [In Russ.: Eko U. Zametki na polyakh “Imeni Rozy”. Moscow, Astrel Publ., 2011, 160 p.].